Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

Page Load Speed

9.4 sec in total

First Response

2.3 sec

Resources Loaded

6.8 sec

Page Rendered

405 ms

wreply.com screenshot

About Website

Visit wreply.com now to see the best up-to-date Wreply content for Turkey and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wreply.com

Wreply, web tasarım ve geliştirme ile ilgili konular, webmasterlar için araç,uygulama ve servisleri tanıtan bir web tasarım blogu. HTML - CSS - jQuery

Visit wreply.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wreply.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wreply.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

77/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,350 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wreply.com

2275 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

284 ms

crayon.min.css

290 ms

tooltip.css

314 ms

wpknb.css

322 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Wreply.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Wreply.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 694.4 kB (47%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

786.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Wreply.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 641.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 75.0 kB

  • Original 93.3 kB
  • After minification 90.2 kB
  • After compression 18.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 84.5 kB

  • Original 581.1 kB
  • After minification 496.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wreply needs image optimization as it can save up to 84.5 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 396.5 kB

  • Original 641.0 kB
  • After minification 640.6 kB
  • After compression 244.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 396.5 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 138.5 kB

  • Original 165.4 kB
  • After minification 161.0 kB
  • After compression 26.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wreply.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 138.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (40%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

49

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wreply. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

wreply.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

wreply.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

wreply.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    TR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wreply.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Turkish. Our system also found out that Wreply.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wreply. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: