1.5 sec in total
71 ms
1.1 sec
338 ms
Visit writeforthejob.net now to see the best up-to-date Write For The Job content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about writeforthejob.net
Revamp your résumé, cover letter, and LinkedIn profile to land a job that makes you happy. One-on-one career coaching to help you get hired. Local (NY) or remote services.
Visit writeforthejob.netWe analyzed Writeforthejob.net page load time and found that the first response time was 71 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
writeforthejob.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value2,920 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.072
96/100
15%
Value19.4 s
2/100
10%
71 ms
29 ms
59 ms
742 ms
42 ms
Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Writeforthejob.net, 43% (9 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 43% (9 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (742 ms) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 927.6 kB (59%)
1.6 MB
633.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Writeforthejob.net main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 891.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 891.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Write For The Job needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (50%)
20
10
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Write For The Job. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.writeforthejob.net
71 ms
minified.js
29 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
59 ms
polyfill.min.js
742 ms
thunderbolt-commons.83c93ab6.bundle.min.js
42 ms
main.322bbfd8.bundle.min.js
45 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
43 ms
lodash.min.js
44 ms
react.production.min.js
44 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
47 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
45 ms
65aa12_1ec5bff8f6784165b4c0ebf41b7ad72c~mv2_d_6964_4712_s_4_2.png
132 ms
demorris-byrd-K8RAfoZxoYI-unsplash.jpg
176 ms
65aa12_a541ced652ad4b6bbb1d58d4c6968373f000.jpg
182 ms
65aa12_ad76aa3da6584db38f9977e9f676a341~mv2.jpg
185 ms
65aa12_ee0c4a535a914ee3b74f22e5d783a869~mv2.webp
182 ms
65aa12_ee0c4a535a914ee3b74f22e5d783a869~mv2.webp
183 ms
65aa12_2991c359ce8747a8867af652fe6e8cb4~mv2.webp
182 ms
65aa12_2991c359ce8747a8867af652fe6e8cb4~mv2.webp
182 ms
65aa12_5e553046f34544de86cbffd9f22ff816~mv2.webp
183 ms
bundle.min.js
106 ms
writeforthejob.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
writeforthejob.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
writeforthejob.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writeforthejob.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writeforthejob.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
writeforthejob.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Write For The Job. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: