1.9 sec in total
102 ms
1.4 sec
333 ms
Visit writersonprocess.com now to see the best up-to-date Writerson Process content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about writersonprocess.com
Songwriters on Process features nothing but interviews with songwriters about their creative process, from beginning to end.
Visit writersonprocess.comWe analyzed Writersonprocess.com page load time and found that the first response time was 102 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
writersonprocess.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value11.9 s
0/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value1,870 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.139
79/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
102 ms
61 ms
33 ms
57 ms
265 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Writersonprocess.com, 15% (4 requests) were made to Static1.squarespace.com and 12% (3 requests) were made to Static.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (265 ms) relates to the external source Use.typekit.net.
Page size can be reduced by 133.5 kB (49%)
274.2 kB
140.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Writersonprocess.com main page is 274.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 153.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 133.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.5 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 89 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Writerson Process images are well optimized though.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (54%)
13
6
The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writerson Process. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.songwritersonprocess.com
102 ms
XV4L7e1vi6RH4rBxakzkSl4iLto6b50H7-8-xSC0DJjfe76ffFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9X5AI3ZAFqZQsKw2iKFcjU524yFcsyZgTziaiaO1FzdciaSc8XZW4Ddho3ScNRZWFDOcFzdPUDdho1ia4TiemkShN0SY4zjhmDSkoRdhXCjcm0OAN3-WgyScq0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOfG0jcm0OAN3-WgyScq0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlJ6U3ScNt-AuyOAozicI7fbKnMsMMeMI6MKG4f5J7IMMjMkMfH6qJn3IbMg6IJMJ7fbKlMsMMeMj6MKG4fH3gIMMjfkMfH6qJK3IbMg6YJMJ7fbKTMsMMeM66MKG4f5w7IMMj2PMfH6qJKbIbMg64JMJ7fbK3MsMMeMt6MKG4fHtgIMMjIfMfH6qJRMIbMg6sJMJ.js
61 ms
css
33 ms
site.js
57 ms
d
265 ms
common-3827d4107f55ae912a8c-min.js
49 ms
commerce-cf5ca5fa5feb9716f7f4-min.js
28 ms
commerce-7f4130fee43d9b486ac93410db2112d3-min.css
17 ms
site.css
33 ms
social-accounts.svg
64 ms
5TmPggSw_normal.jpeg
89 ms
58 ms
icon-searchqueries-20-dark.png
56 ms
3b7zjXgPB4rDPwA=
26 ms
AA==
26 ms
3b7zjXgPB4rDPwA=
24 ms
IVfJT2K4qqqqmuhph02uq9UU8v92+8414DweKwz8A
24 ms
3b7zjXgPB4rDPwA=
18 ms
fPvCNeAE2EsNDAA==
15 ms
fPvCNeAE2EsNDAA==
15 ms
3b7zjXgPB4rDPwA=
14 ms
IVfJT2K4qqqqmuhph02uq9UU8v92+8414DweKwz8A
14 ms
p2fRo5o74AQGlv0oA
12 ms
3b7zjXgPB4rDPwA=
12 ms
AA==
11 ms
widgets.js
20 ms
writersonprocess.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
writersonprocess.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
writersonprocess.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writersonprocess.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writersonprocess.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
writersonprocess.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Writerson Process. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: