Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

writing-fonts.com

Layanan Ide Bisnis Bagi Pemula - My WordPress Blog

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

54 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

156 ms

writing-fonts.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Writing Fonts content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about writing-fonts.com

My WordPress Blog

Visit writing-fonts.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Writing-fonts.com page load time and found that the first response time was 54 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

writing-fonts.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

writing-fonts.com

54 ms

www.writingfont.com

115 ms

leBj2pt0HKJh_Wh_2x0_Njdlakw.js

6 ms

node.css

22 ms

defaults.css

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Writing-fonts.com, 48% (31 requests) were made to Writingfont.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to S.swiftypecdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Writing-fonts.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 702.8 kB (57%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

534.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Writing-fonts.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 798.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 78.6 kB

  • Original 100.3 kB
  • After minification 98.5 kB
  • After compression 21.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 168.1 kB
  • After minification 164.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Writing Fonts images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 498.4 kB

  • Original 798.9 kB
  • After minification 791.6 kB
  • After compression 300.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 498.4 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 122.0 kB

  • Original 169.8 kB
  • After minification 134.5 kB
  • After compression 47.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writing-fonts.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 122.0 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (48%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writing Fonts. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

writing-fonts.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writing-fonts.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Writing-fonts.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Writing Fonts. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: