4.5 sec in total
Click here to check amazing Writingforresults content for Canada. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about writingforresults.net
Henry Ford said, ‘Nothing is particularly hard if you divide it into small jobs.’ Writing for Results does just that for briefing notes and briefing books.Visit writingforresults.net
We analyzed Writingforresults.net page load time and found that the first response time was 354 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
writingforresults.net performance score
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Writingforresults.net, 11% (8 requests) were made to Thefreedictionary.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Img.tfd.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (804 ms) belongs to the original domain Writingforresults.net.
Page size can be reduced by 305.6 kB (31%)
In fact, the total size of Writingforresults.net main page is 976.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 806.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 108.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 181.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Writingforresults needs image optimization as it can save up to 181.9 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 14.9 kB
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (46%)
writingforresults.net accessibility score
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
writingforresults.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
Browser errors were logged to the console
writingforresults.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Links are not crawlable
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writingforresults.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Writingforresults.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Writingforresults. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: