4.5 sec in total
354 ms
1.3 sec
2.9 sec
Click here to check amazing Writingforresults content for Canada. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about writingforresults.net
Henry Ford said, ‘Nothing is particularly hard if you divide it into small jobs.’ Writing for Results does just that for briefing notes and briefing books.
Visit writingforresults.netWe analyzed Writingforresults.net page load time and found that the first response time was 354 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
writingforresults.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
76/100
10%
Value3.7 s
59/100
25%
Value3.4 s
90/100
10%
Value150 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.019
100/100
15%
Value5.9 s
66/100
10%
354 ms
170 ms
75 ms
29 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Writingforresults.net, 11% (8 requests) were made to Thefreedictionary.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Img.tfd.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (804 ms) belongs to the original domain Writingforresults.net.
Page size can be reduced by 305.6 kB (31%)
976.0 kB
670.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Writingforresults.net main page is 976.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 806.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 108.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 181.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Writingforresults needs image optimization as it can save up to 181.9 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 14.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 14.9 kB or 40% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (46%)
65
35
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writingforresults. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
writingforresults.net
354 ms
mm_menu.js
170 ms
I.aspx
75 ms
in.js
29 ms
jsapi
30 ms
default.css
74 ms
element.js
216 ms
loader.js
287 ms
js1.aspx
306 ms
js1.aspx
251 ms
js1.aspx
251 ms
js1.aspx
306 ms
js1.aspx
305 ms
js1.aspx
305 ms
js1.aspx
351 ms
counter.js
169 ms
counter.js
169 ms
urchin.js
134 ms
quant.js
170 ms
get
70 ms
webValidator.aspx
169 ms
I.aspx
243 ms
blue-seal-250-52-whitetxt-writingforresultsinc-49362.png
255 ms
Help.gif
220 ms
spacer.gif
147 ms
index_r1_c1_s1.jpg
147 ms
index_r2_c1_s1.jpg
205 ms
index_r2_c2_s1.jpg
224 ms
index_r2_c3_s1.jpg
254 ms
index_r3_c2_s1.jpg
223 ms
index_r4_c2_s1.jpg
223 ms
index_r5_c2_s1.jpg
221 ms
index_r6_c2_s1.jpg
254 ms
index_r7_c2_s1.jpg
263 ms
index_r8_c2_s1.jpg
263 ms
index_r9_c2_s1.jpg
264 ms
index_r10_c2_s1.jpg
263 ms
index_r11_c2_s1.jpg
362 ms
index_r12_c2.gif
363 ms
index_r13_c2_s1.jpg
363 ms
EAC_member_logo.jpg
397 ms
Clarity.jpg
363 ms
IABC.png
457 ms
PLAIN.png
469 ms
contents.fw.png
455 ms
signature.gif
395 ms
Writing-for-Results-Inc.png
511 ms
Rob-8-1.jpg
804 ms
arrows.gif
388 ms
mmmenu3_262x43_up.gif
434 ms
mmmenu4_219x43_up.gif
446 ms
mmmenu2_343x43_up.gif
463 ms
mmmenu1_240x43_up.gif
445 ms
like.php
119 ms
g-y-rss.gif
47 ms
Enrico_Caruso.jpeg
77 ms
Black_Hawk_Down_Super64_over_Mogadishu_coast.jpg
74 ms
Svaughan.jpg
69 ms
descartes.jpg
66 ms
hangman.aspx
104 ms
t.php
93 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
rules-p-a3xxlqtk05o-E.js
10 ms
rules-p-a3xxlqtk05o-E.js
63 ms
blxue7LW05k.js
77 ms
FEppCFCt76d.png
78 ms
hangman.png
44 ms
pixel;r=2034918354;rf=0;a=p-a3xxlqtk05o-E;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwritingforresults.net%2F;uht=2;fpan=1;fpa=P0-2041431661-1664830637249;pbc=;ns=0;ce=1;qjs=1;qv=39016d63-20220929161725;cm=;gdpr=0;ref=;d=writingforresults.net;dst=0;et=1664830637249;tzo=-180;ogl=;ses=116f2546-db90-4aa2-a6c3-4343d60694af
54 ms
FollowCompany.js
93 ms
index_r2_c2_s2.jpg
72 ms
index_r4_c2_s2.jpg
73 ms
index_r6_c2_s2.jpg
72 ms
index_r8_c2_s2.jpg
71 ms
index_r10_c2_s2.jpg
69 ms
writingforresults.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
writingforresults.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
writingforresults.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writingforresults.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Writingforresults.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
writingforresults.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Writingforresults. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: