2.9 sec in total
253 ms
2.2 sec
449 ms
Visit writingmachine.com now to see the best up-to-date Writing Machine content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about writingmachine.com
Writing Machine Academy and Writing Machine Agency - the home of the Structured Writing Method™. Call us today on +44 (0) 1962 841250
Visit writingmachine.comWe analyzed Writingmachine.com page load time and found that the first response time was 253 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
writingmachine.com performance score
253 ms
405 ms
82 ms
169 ms
235 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Writingmachine.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (846 ms) belongs to the original domain Writingmachine.com.
Page size can be reduced by 84.5 kB (11%)
764.9 kB
680.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Writingmachine.com main page is 764.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 288.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Writing Machine needs image optimization as it can save up to 30.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 8.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writingmachine.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (76%)
68
16
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writing Machine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
writingmachine.com
253 ms
writingmachine.com
405 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
82 ms
style.css
169 ms
learndash_quiz_front.css
235 ms
style.min.css
245 ms
front.min.css
247 ms
jquery.dropdown.min.css
248 ms
learndash_pager.css
245 ms
learndash_template_style.css
250 ms
theme-my-login.min.css
309 ms
bootstrap.min.css
400 ms
wdm_fe.css
327 ms
jquery-ui.css
22 ms
pistyle.css
328 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.css
329 ms
propanel.css
338 ms
app.css
388 ms
frontend.css
412 ms
style.css
411 ms
icomoon.min.css
411 ms
5ea36dde500df5eed81afdbe4704102d.min.css
586 ms
jquery.js
555 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
473 ms
wdm-cart-validate.js
472 ms
front.js
470 ms
theme-my-login.min.js
471 ms
core.min.js
547 ms
widget.min.js
551 ms
accordion.min.js
551 ms
tinymce1.min.js
846 ms
wdm-fe.js
672 ms
chart.js
674 ms
tabs.min.js
670 ms
mouse.min.js
669 ms
resizable.min.js
671 ms
draggable.min.js
706 ms
button.min.js
703 ms
style.min.css
713 ms
theme.min.css
653 ms
rs6.css
609 ms
position.min.js
571 ms
dialog.min.js
563 ms
propanel.js
569 ms
script.js
565 ms
scripts.js
606 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
722 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
668 ms
js.cookie.min.js
648 ms
woocommerce.min.js
643 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
641 ms
rbtools.min.js
639 ms
rs6.min.js
718 ms
app.js
569 ms
wp-embed.min.js
567 ms
dabb42eda961511a593302c6bb177d62.min.js
741 ms
analytics.js
81 ms
dummy.png
142 ms
WMAgency-Logo-400px.png
156 ms
WMAcademy-Logo-400px.png
156 ms
logo-open-text.jpg
162 ms
logo-grant-thornton.jpg
280 ms
logo-lloyds-banking-group-featured.jpg
280 ms
logo-towers-watson.jpg
279 ms
logo-knight-frank-featured.jpg
280 ms
logo-atkins-featured.jpg
309 ms
logo-hays.jpg
281 ms
logo-premex-featured.jpg
374 ms
tree-icon-1200px-1024x1024.png
517 ms
awb-icons.woff
290 ms
collect
29 ms
collect
132 ms
writingmachine.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writingmachine.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writingmachine.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
writingmachine.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Writing Machine. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: