Tools & Wizards About Us
writingtool.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

writingtool.com

Writing Tool - Writing Center > Home

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

359 ms

Resources Loaded

889 ms

Page Rendered

138 ms

writingtool.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to writingtool.com homepage info - get ready to check Writing Tool best content right away, or after learning these important things about writingtool.com

Visit writingtool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Writingtool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 359 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

writingtool.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

writingtool.com

359 ms

default.css

241 ms

skin.css

314 ms

jquery.min.js

406 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

472 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Writingtool.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (472 ms) belongs to the original domain Writingtool.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 611.4 kB (76%)

Content Size

801.2 kB

After Optimization

189.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Writingtool.com main page is 801.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 632.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 12.5 kB
  • After minification 11.1 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.2 kB or 58% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

  • Original 26.9 kB
  • After minification 17.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Writing Tool needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 480.7 kB

  • Original 632.3 kB
  • After minification 557.5 kB
  • After compression 151.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 480.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 114.1 kB

  • Original 129.5 kB
  • After minification 80.7 kB
  • After compression 15.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writingtool.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 114.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (60%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writing Tool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

writingtool.com

writingtool.com

359 ms

default.css

default.css

241 ms

skin.css

skin.css

314 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

406 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

472 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

151 ms

Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd

Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd

370 ms

dnn.js

dnn.js

234 ms

jquery.hoverIntent.min.js

jquery.hoverIntent.min.js

247 ms

dnn.jquery.js

dnn.jquery.js

384 ms

dnncore.js

dnncore.js

321 ms

dnn.modalpopup.js

dnn.modalpopup.js

320 ms

initWidgets.js

initWidgets.js

391 ms

search.png

search.png

74 ms

globe.png

globe.png

75 ms

DotNetNukeAjaxShared.js

DotNetNukeAjaxShared.js

76 ms

SEO Factors

writingtool.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writingtool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writingtool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

writingtool.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Writing Tool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: