8.2 sec in total
1.2 sec
6.7 sec
379 ms
Welcome to wro2013.org homepage info - get ready to check Wro 2013 best content right away, or after learning these important things about wro2013.org
Visit wro2013.orgWe analyzed Wro2013.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
wro2013.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value3.8 s
55/100
25%
Value5.0 s
64/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.8 s
90/100
10%
1159 ms
1413 ms
1153 ms
1444 ms
868 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Wro2013.org, 6% (5 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Translate.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Wro2013.org.
Page size can be reduced by 773.7 kB (38%)
2.0 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Wro2013.org main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 165.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wro 2013 needs image optimization as it can save up to 165.4 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 547.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 547.5 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wro2013.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (36%)
77
49
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wro 2013. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wro2013.org
1159 ms
jquery-1.6.3.min.js
1413 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
1153 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
1444 ms
jquery.spritely-0.6.js
868 ms
queryLoader.css
582 ms
queryLoader.js
577 ms
announcement.css
872 ms
nav.css
871 ms
main.css
1162 ms
screen.css
1162 ms
jquery.bgiframe.js
1162 ms
jquery.dimensions.js
1459 ms
jquery.tooltip.js
1460 ms
chili-1.7.pack.js
1461 ms
element.js
34 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
1459 ms
1.7-jquery.min.js
1982 ms
1.8-jquery-ui.min.js
2590 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1733 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.js
2026 ms
countdown.css
1474 ms
jquery-1.3.2.min.js
2046 ms
countdown.js
1747 ms
abstract-silk-background.jpg
1435 ms
wro_logo.png
806 ms
updates.png
862 ms
more1.png
856 ms
out.png
1097 ms
updates-btm.png
1155 ms
wro2013cdw.png
1433 ms
01.png
1200 ms
02.png
1384 ms
03.png
1411 ms
lego.png
1439 ms
NI.png
1452 ms
HT.png
1672 ms
tetrix.png
1703 ms
matrix.png
1724 ms
mikrobot.png
1722 ms
translateelement.css
67 ms
main.js
86 ms
sky1.png
1651 ms
cloud.png
1664 ms
skyline1.png
1876 ms
monasa.png
2200 ms
road.png
2507 ms
airplane.gif
2791 ms
nxtsm.png
1941 ms
4Wheel.png
1955 ms
nxt2.png
2163 ms
globalheader.png
2236 ms
globalnav.png
2248 ms
globalnav_text.png
2450 ms
element_main.js
35 ms
slider.html
1440 ms
divider.gif
1475 ms
notice.png
1488 ms
countdown3.png
1625 ms
countdown1.png
1674 ms
countdown2.png
1683 ms
translate_24dp.png
24 ms
l
38 ms
cleardot.gif
35 ms
te_ctrl3.gif
10 ms
slider.css
327 ms
nivo-slider.css
341 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
529 ms
loading.gif
306 ms
1.jpg
291 ms
2.jpg
869 ms
3.jpg
306 ms
4.jpg
302 ms
5.jpg
583 ms
6.jpg
581 ms
slider.html
293 ms
arrows.png
293 ms
bullets.png
295 ms
shadow2.png
295 ms
wro2013.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wro2013.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
wro2013.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wro2013.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wro2013.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wro2013.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wro 2013. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: