Tools & Wizards About Us
xebra.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

xebra.com

SOLUTIONS | xebra

Page Load Speed

838 ms in total

First Response

132 ms

Resources Loaded

462 ms

Page Rendered

244 ms

xebra.com screenshot

About Website

Visit xebra.com now to see the best up-to-date Xebra content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xebra.com

The ultimate software solution for print and promotional products distributors. Complete operations, complete integration...One software, one solution.

Visit xebra.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xebra.com page load time and found that the first response time was 132 ms and then it took 706 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xebra.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xebra.com

132 ms

xebraStyle.css

42 ms

xetexUtilities.js

112 ms

ga.js

10 ms

ImageMaker.exe

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Xebra.com, 14% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (212 ms) belongs to the original domain Xebra.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 75.5 kB (25%)

Content Size

302.6 kB

After Optimization

227.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Xebra.com main page is 302.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 215.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 15.4 kB

  • Original 19.1 kB
  • After minification 17.0 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.1 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 16.8 kB

  • Original 215.7 kB
  • After minification 198.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xebra images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 38.4 kB

  • Original 61.9 kB
  • After minification 45.6 kB
  • After compression 23.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.4 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 6.0 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB
  • After compression 969 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xebra.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (38%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xebra. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

xebra.com

xebra.com

132 ms

xebraStyle.css

xebraStyle.css

42 ms

xetexUtilities.js

xetexUtilities.js

112 ms

ga.js

ga.js

10 ms

ImageMaker.exe

ImageMaker.exe

75 ms

Header.jpg

Header.jpg

74 ms

ImageMaker.exe

ImageMaker.exe

44 ms

xebracom-body-blank-2.png

xebracom-body-blank-2.png

119 ms

ImageMaker.exe

ImageMaker.exe

70 ms

2011-aug-lefthalf.gif

2011-aug-lefthalf.gif

212 ms

2011-aug-righthalf.jpg

2011-aug-righthalf.jpg

159 ms

ImageMaker.exe

ImageMaker.exe

139 ms

ImageMaker.exe

ImageMaker.exe

112 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

Accessibility Review

xebra.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

xebra.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

xebra.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xebra.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Xebra.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

xebra.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xebra. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: