Tools & Wizards About Us
xed01.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

xed01.com

Page Load Speed

12.3 sec in total

First Response

967 ms

Resources Loaded

11.1 sec

Page Rendered

216 ms

xed01.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to xed01.com homepage info - get ready to check Xed 01 best content right away, or after learning these important things about xed01.com

欢迎光临希尔顿娱乐城与bbin进行技术合作，共同打造高质量游戏平台，打造诚信第一品牌

Visit xed01.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xed01.com page load time and found that the first response time was 967 ms and then it took 11.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xed01.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

xed01.com

967 ms

www.8456.com

6605 ms

style.css

131 ms

get

245 ms

6c7073b069182956157dde40770c2e12

2572 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xed01.com, 57% (12 requests) were made to 8456.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Tracedseals.starfieldtech.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.6 sec) relates to the external source 8456.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 55.6 kB (7%)

Content Size

842.2 kB

After Optimization

786.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Xed01.com main page is 842.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 800.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 8.5 kB
  • After minification 7.6 kB
  • After compression 2.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 916 B, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 27.3 kB

  • Original 800.1 kB
  • After minification 772.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xed 01 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 20.1 kB

  • Original 30.7 kB
  • After minification 30.7 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 2.9 kB
  • After minification 2.8 kB
  • After compression 799 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xed01.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.1 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (16%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xed 01. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

xed01.com

xed01.com

967 ms

www.8456.com

www.8456.com

6605 ms

style.css

style.css

131 ms

get

get

245 ms

6c7073b069182956157dde40770c2e12

6c7073b069182956157dde40770c2e12

2572 ms

bg.png

bg.png

680 ms

login-bg.png

login-bg.png

203 ms

nav-bg.png

nav-bg.png

436 ms

index_04.jpg

index_04.jpg

338 ms

tb-bg.png

tb-bg.png

140 ms

index_08.jpg

index_08.jpg

338 ms

index_11.jpg

index_11.jpg

338 ms

index_14.jpg

index_14.jpg

337 ms

bt-bg.png

bt-bg.png

436 ms

3265 ms

gtagb4.js

gtagb4.js

32 ms

icon.png

icon.png

268 ms

z_stat.php

z_stat.php

807 ms

stat.htm

stat.htm

249 ms

core.php

core.php

826 ms

siteseal_base_lite.gif

siteseal_base_lite.gif

178 ms

SEO Factors

xed01.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xed01.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Xed01.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

xed01.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xed 01. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: