3.9 sec in total
462 ms
2.1 sec
1.3 sec
Visit xest.com now to see the best up-to-date Xest content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xest.com
We offer online collaboration tools for businesses as well as education instituations providing you with loads of collaboration tools & programs including screen sharing programs. Get in touch with us...
Visit xest.comWe analyzed Xest.com page load time and found that the first response time was 462 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
xest.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value3.5 s
89/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.4 s
72/100
10%
462 ms
384 ms
56 ms
270 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Xest.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (994 ms) belongs to the original domain Xest.com.
Page size can be reduced by 423.6 kB (59%)
723.5 kB
299.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Xest.com main page is 723.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 259.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 56.0 kB, which is 68% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.4 kB or 93% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xest needs image optimization as it can save up to 24.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 89.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.6 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 232.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xest.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 232.7 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (45%)
38
21
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xest. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
xest.com
462 ms
bootstrap.css
384 ms
css
56 ms
animate.css
270 ms
jquery.min.js
49 ms
bootstrap.js
190 ms
waypoints.min.js
141 ms
xest-1.js
199 ms
gtm.js
825 ms
xestlogo1.png
688 ms
generalproductsimage3.png
875 ms
share_icon.png
728 ms
bring_icon.png
650 ms
groups_icon.png
717 ms
notes_icon.png
719 ms
file_icon.png
729 ms
byod_icon.png
728 ms
youtubemain_icon.png
746 ms
storm_icon.png
751 ms
poll_icon.png
748 ms
carousel-1.png
837 ms
carousel-2.png
835 ms
carousel-3.png
836 ms
cqu_logo.png
835 ms
uq_logo.png
835 ms
qut_logo.png
934 ms
usyd_logo.png
919 ms
vuw_logo.png
918 ms
twitter_icon.jpg
916 ms
facebook_icon.jpg
917 ms
youtube_icon.jpg
916 ms
linkedin_icon.jpg
994 ms
googleplus_icon.png
994 ms
w.js
389 ms
ua_logo.png
352 ms
durham_logo.png
350 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
187 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
246 ms
1c0270c1-317c-4424-9a3b-243dfb9e7dd9.js
303 ms
analytics.js
175 ms
collect
43 ms
xest.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
ARIA IDs are not unique
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
xest.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
xest.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xest.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xest.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xest.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xest. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: