Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

xf.cc

圈能力服务商后台

Page Load Speed

40.8 sec in total

First Response

2.1 sec

Resources Loaded

37.7 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

xf.cc screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Xf content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xf.cc

犀牛云,全球领先的营销云!四大杀手级的营销云应用,辅助犀牛云应用商店的数千款企业管理与应用,覆盖企业发展的全生命周期,帮助企业实现经营业绩的成倍增长奇迹

Visit xf.cc

Key Findings

We analyzed Xf.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 38.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xf.cc performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xf.cc

2092 ms

www.xf.cc

14819 ms

CgAGS1cDGyWAEzl-AACDgCb-ylQ283.css

3492 ms

jqueryV173.js

1485 ms

Public.js

3076 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Xf.cc, 44% (36 requests) were made to 1.rc.xiniu.com and 43% (35 requests) were made to 0.rc.xiniu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (15.6 sec) relates to the external source 0.rc.xiniu.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 228.2 kB (48%)

Content Size

474.9 kB

After Optimization

246.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Xf.cc main page is 474.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 231.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 31.6 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.0 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 32.4 kB

  • Original 231.5 kB
  • After minification 199.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xf needs image optimization as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 84.4 kB

  • Original 110.9 kB
  • After minification 88.3 kB
  • After compression 26.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 84.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 79.3 kB

  • Original 92.8 kB
  • After minification 70.9 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xf.cc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 79.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (8%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

72

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

xf.cc accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

xf.cc best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

xf.cc SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xf.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Xf.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: