1.4 sec in total
16 ms
1.3 sec
67 ms
Visit xgraphix.net now to see the best up-to-date Xgraphix content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xgraphix.net
Visit xgraphix.netWe analyzed Xgraphix.net page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
xgraphix.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value9.8 s
0/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value950 ms
29/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.7 s
28/100
10%
16 ms
347 ms
60 ms
118 ms
171 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xgraphix.net, 81% (54 requests) were made to Xgraphix.com and 13% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (612 ms) relates to the external source Xgraphix.com.
Page size can be reduced by 115.2 kB (6%)
2.1 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Xgraphix.net main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 104.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xgraphix images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 297 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xgraphix.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (77%)
56
13
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xgraphix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xgraphix.net
16 ms
xgraphix.com
347 ms
styles.css
60 ms
public-main.css
118 ms
style.min.css
171 ms
theme.min.css
173 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
229 ms
post-6.css
172 ms
frontend.min.css
175 ms
swiper.min.css
175 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
232 ms
global.css
236 ms
post-770.css
233 ms
post-753.css
235 ms
post-766.css
235 ms
css
27 ms
jquery.min.js
341 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
285 ms
public-main.js
294 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
292 ms
widget-mega-menu.min.css
293 ms
widget-animated-headline.min.css
293 ms
animations.min.css
438 ms
rs6.css
439 ms
index.js
440 ms
index.js
439 ms
rbtools.min.js
503 ms
rs6.min.js
526 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
462 ms
instant_click.min.js
462 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
462 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
461 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
502 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
502 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
503 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
589 ms
hooks.min.js
612 ms
i18n.min.js
609 ms
frontend.min.js
611 ms
waypoints.min.js
560 ms
core.min.js
505 ms
frontend.min.js
473 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
474 ms
underscore.min.js
472 ms
wp-util.min.js
470 ms
frontend.min.js
469 ms
xgraphix-new-logo-clear-2.png
272 ms
xgraphix-print-shop-logo.png
408 ms
gotwrap-logo-trans-black@0.5x.png
298 ms
xgraphix-promo-logo.png
411 ms
xgraphix-web-logo.png
412 ms
1_u6dWj4ZvD52PlhguJO35nw.gif
300 ms
products-3-alex-1024x907-2.png
413 ms
printed-wraps-hero_xt6vp2.png
579 ms
popular.webp
414 ms
responsive-website-design-5b98923c.png
525 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4TC1O4a0Fg.ttf
27 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4QK1O4a0Fg.ttf
67 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4W61O4a0Fg.ttf
195 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4bC1O4a0Fg.ttf
102 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4TC0O4a0Fg.ttf
100 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4e6yO4a0Fg.ttf
99 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4deyO4a0Fg.ttf
195 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4bCyO4a0Fg.ttf
102 ms
QGYyz_MVcBeNP4NjuGObqx1XmO1I4ZmyO4a0Fg.ttf
160 ms
embed
412 ms
js
52 ms
xgraphix.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
xgraphix.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
xgraphix.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xgraphix.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xgraphix.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xgraphix.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xgraphix. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: