Tools & Wizards About Us
xightseeing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

xightseeing.com

Xightseeing Xcursions | Sightseeing Tours in Cancun, Mexico

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

147 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

xightseeing.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Xightseeing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xightseeing.com

Visit Xightseeing Xcursions and get the most out of your Cancun, Mexico experience! Go on tours and even go shopping in select areas. Book online now!

Visit xightseeing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xightseeing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xightseeing.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

90/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

80/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,680 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.5 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xightseeing.com

147 ms

935 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

26 ms

email-decode.min.js

16 ms

jquery.min.js

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Xightseeing.com, 15% (5 requests) were made to Dp58aslhmbcib.cloudfront.net and 9% (3 requests) were made to Fareharbor.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (935 ms) belongs to the original domain Xightseeing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 215.8 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Xightseeing.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 792.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 169.6 kB

  • Original 219.4 kB
  • After minification 218.7 kB
  • After compression 49.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 169.6 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 664 B

  • Original 331.5 kB
  • After minification 330.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xightseeing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 45.1 kB

  • Original 792.5 kB
  • After minification 792.5 kB
  • After compression 747.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 311 B

  • Original 42.1 kB
  • After minification 42.1 kB
  • After compression 41.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xightseeing.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (67%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xightseeing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

xightseeing.com

xightseeing.com

147 ms

935 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

sbi-styles.min.css

26 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

16 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

28 ms

scripts.php

scripts.php

30 ms

integration-kit-bundle.js

integration-kit-bundle.js

125 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

170 ms

mixpanel-2-latest.min.js

mixpanel-2-latest.min.js

302 ms

sightseeing-tours-in-cancun.jpg

sightseeing-tours-in-cancun.jpg

393 ms

logo-xightseeing.png

logo-xightseeing.png

384 ms

WhatsApp-Image-2022-06-02-at-11.33.00-AM.jpeg

WhatsApp-Image-2022-06-02-at-11.33.00-AM.jpeg

392 ms

sbi-sprite.png

sbi-sprite.png

284 ms

319 ms

318 ms

272 ms

560 ms

559 ms

516 ms

605 ms

658 ms

604 ms

787 ms

809 ms

374 ms

style-cart.f8bf778fe9ad9c695ee5.css

style-cart.f8bf778fe9ad9c695ee5.css

37 ms

output.96d176313e1c.js

output.96d176313e1c.js

55 ms

fonts.eacdf4961de415ddab83.css

fonts.eacdf4961de415ddab83.css

52 ms

output.01ae5de84ee3.js

output.01ae5de84ee3.js

38 ms

js

js

117 ms

djangojs.js

djangojs.js

70 ms

output.d251868b71f0.js

output.d251868b71f0.js

19 ms

main.js

main.js

56 ms

Accessibility Review

xightseeing.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

xightseeing.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

xightseeing.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xightseeing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xightseeing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

xightseeing.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xightseeing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: