2.3 sec in total
559 ms
1.5 sec
192 ms
Visit xlazz.com now to see the best up-to-date XLazz content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xlazz.com
Your augmented reality is here. Get it!
Visit xlazz.comWe analyzed Xlazz.com page load time and found that the first response time was 559 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
xlazz.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.2 s
0/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value1,260 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.087
93/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
559 ms
41 ms
35 ms
37 ms
31 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Xlazz.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (559 ms) belongs to the original domain Xlazz.com.
Page size can be reduced by 480.5 kB (63%)
762.1 kB
281.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Xlazz.com main page is 762.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 351.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. XLazz images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 242.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 242.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 200.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xlazz.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 200.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (79%)
57
12
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XLazz. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.xlazz.com
559 ms
front.css
41 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
35 ms
arconix-faq.css
37 ms
styles.css
31 ms
public.min.css
28 ms
checkbox.min.css
37 ms
style.css
36 ms
font-awesome.css
45 ms
front.css
47 ms
form.min.css
51 ms
genericons.css
81 ms
jetpack.css
75 ms
jquery.js
89 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
73 ms
public.min.js
80 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
72 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
119 ms
jquery.theme-main.min.js
117 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
117 ms
modernizr.custom.82187.js
118 ms
general.js
120 ms
sdk.js
124 ms
jscripts.php
150 ms
flexslider.css
133 ms
public.css
133 ms
wp-slimstat.min.js
145 ms
jquery.form.min.js
134 ms
scripts.js
141 ms
jscripts-ftr-min.js
145 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
9 ms
gprofiles.js
121 ms
wpgroho.js
144 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
152 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
style.css
133 ms
sdk.js
176 ms
library.js
222 ms
analytics.js
30 ms
xlazz-logo-e1401301334767.png
30 ms
bt200_fca-r_690x460-690x172.jpg
27 ms
moverio-images_4-670x167.jpg
28 ms
moverio-images_11-670x167.jpg
26 ms
more-icon.png
57 ms
001-white-272x182.png
58 ms
logo_769485_web.jpg
57 ms
moverio-images_4-272x182.jpg
55 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
53 ms
collect
67 ms
vantage-icons.woff
44 ms
hovercard.css
64 ms
services.css
121 ms
g.gif
33 ms
145 ms
xd_arbiter.php
136 ms
xd_arbiter.php
274 ms
slide-indicator-active.png
18 ms
slide-indicator-inactive.png
20 ms
gallery-prev.png
19 ms
gallery-next.png
17 ms
xlazz.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
xlazz.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
xlazz.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xlazz.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Xlazz.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xlazz.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of XLazz. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: