2.2 sec in total
399 ms
1.7 sec
140 ms
Welcome to xlcomparator.net homepage info - get ready to check Xlcomparator best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about xlcomparator.net
XL Comparator is a free tool to compare two Excel or CSV spreadsheets without programming Excel macros nor installing software on your computer.
Visit xlcomparator.netWe analyzed Xlcomparator.net page load time and found that the first response time was 399 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
xlcomparator.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value5.1 s
61/100
10%
Value180 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value9.0 s
34/100
10%
399 ms
83 ms
163 ms
168 ms
191 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Xlcomparator.net, 11% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (399 ms) belongs to the original domain Xlcomparator.net.
Page size can be reduced by 33.8 kB (35%)
95.9 kB
62.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Xlcomparator.net main page is 95.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 48.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xlcomparator needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 10.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.5 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xlcomparator.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (62%)
42
16
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xlcomparator. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xlcomparator.net
399 ms
style.css
83 ms
theme.css
163 ms
fond.css
168 ms
police_moyenne.css
191 ms
assistants.css
188 ms
lightbox.css
194 ms
cookie.js
252 ms
show_ads.js
5 ms
fond.gif
84 ms
logo_165x113.png
164 ms
onglet_on_gauche.png
84 ms
onglet_on_droite.png
162 ms
onglet_off_gauche2.png
165 ms
onglet_off_droite.png
166 ms
onglet_off_gauche1.png
183 ms
drapeau_fr_18x13.png
185 ms
bandeau_sous_barre.png
198 ms
Etape01_En_787x76.gif
198 ms
puce1_40x40.png
199 ms
puce2_40x40.png
233 ms
ca-pub-5093353905917837.js
64 ms
zrt_lookup.html
138 ms
show_ads_impl.js
61 ms
ga.js
26 ms
__utm.gif
87 ms
all.js
166 ms
ads
198 ms
osd.js
28 ms
ads
213 ms
84 ms
xd_arbiter.php
165 ms
xd_arbiter.php
286 ms
abg.js
32 ms
m_js_controller.js
5 ms
favicon
66 ms
s
29 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
45 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
28 ms
x_button_blue2.png
34 ms
ui
59 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
12 ms
like.php
105 ms
05-jfvEi0Bv.js
289 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
324 ms
xlcomparator.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
xlcomparator.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
xlcomparator.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xlcomparator.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Xlcomparator.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xlcomparator.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xlcomparator. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: