5.4 sec in total
807 ms
4.3 sec
270 ms
Click here to check amazing Xsort content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xsort.in
Visit xsort.inWe analyzed Xsort.in page load time and found that the first response time was 807 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
xsort.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value14.8 s
0/100
25%
Value14.3 s
1/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.446
20/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
807 ms
881 ms
627 ms
850 ms
871 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Xsort.in, 12% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Xsort.in.
Page size can be reduced by 127.0 kB (16%)
777.0 kB
650.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Xsort.in main page is 777.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 494.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xsort images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 45.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 45.4 kB or 27% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xsort.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.4 kB or 36% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (83%)
35
6
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xsort. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xsort.in
807 ms
bootstrap.css
881 ms
select2.min.css
627 ms
megamenu.css
850 ms
animate.min.css
871 ms
owl.carousel.css
585 ms
owl.style.css
585 ms
magnific-popup.css
878 ms
style.css
1466 ms
font-awesome.min.css
906 ms
themify-icons.css
1134 ms
flaticon.css
1160 ms
flaticon.css
1171 ms
masterslider.css
1169 ms
style.css
1187 ms
layer-style.css
1417 ms
ms-staff-style.css
1450 ms
css
33 ms
modernizr.js
1457 ms
jquery.min.js
2050 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1552 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1698 ms
jquery.countTo.js
1739 ms
jquery.waypoints.js
1748 ms
jquery.appear.min.js
1759 ms
select2.min.js
1935 ms
megamenu.js
1982 ms
owl-carousel.js
2030 ms
typed.min.js
2037 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
2134 ms
masterslider.min.js
2624 ms
custom.js
2265 ms
logo.png
2321 ms
breadcrumb2.jpg
1992 ms
call-to-action.png
873 ms
footer.jpg
1457 ms
5aUz9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt7Vptuw.woff
45 ms
5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5alOqEp2jQ.woff
90 ms
5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5fFPqEp2jQ.woff
100 ms
5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5eFIqEp2jQ.woff
100 ms
5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5f1LqEp2jQ.woff
100 ms
fontawesome-webfont3295.woff
1558 ms
themify9f24.woff
1351 ms
xsort.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
xsort.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
xsort.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xsort.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xsort.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xsort.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xsort. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: