Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

yarddigital.com

Yard | Digital Marketing Agency | Edinburgh and Cardiff

Page Load Speed

858 ms in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

577 ms

Page Rendered

109 ms

yarddigital.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Yard Digital content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about yarddigital.com

A data, search and technology agency. We unlock data insights to help you do more with less. More efficient, more effective, more responsible.

Visit yarddigital.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Yarddigital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 686 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

yarddigital.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.322

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

yarddigital.com

172 ms

weareyard.com

259 ms

jkp7hrd.js

136 ms

gtm.js

48 ms

core.svg.css

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Yarddigital.com, 29% (2 requests) were made to Weareyard.com and 29% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (259 ms) relates to the external source Weareyard.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 87.3 kB (72%)

Content Size

120.8 kB

After Optimization

33.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Yarddigital.com main page is 120.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 57.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 10.3 kB
  • After minification 10.1 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 52.9 kB
  • After minification 52.9 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 48.7 kB

  • Original 57.6 kB
  • After minification 57.3 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Yarddigital.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Yard Digital. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

yarddigital.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

yarddigital.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

yarddigital.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Yarddigital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Yarddigital.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: