858 ms in total
172 ms
577 ms
109 ms
Click here to check amazing Yard Digital content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about yarddigital.com
A data, search and technology agency. We unlock data insights to help you do more with less. More efficient, more effective, more responsible.
Visit yarddigital.comWe analyzed Yarddigital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 686 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
yarddigital.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
94/100
10%
Value1.6 s
99/100
25%
Value5.7 s
52/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.322
36/100
15%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
172 ms
259 ms
136 ms
48 ms
87 ms
Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Yarddigital.com, 29% (2 requests) were made to Weareyard.com and 29% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (259 ms) relates to the external source Weareyard.com.
Page size can be reduced by 87.3 kB (72%)
120.8 kB
33.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Yarddigital.com main page is 120.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 57.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Yarddigital.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
5
5
The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Yard Digital. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
yarddigital.com
172 ms
weareyard.com
259 ms
jkp7hrd.js
136 ms
gtm.js
48 ms
core.svg.css
87 ms
analytics.js
6 ms
collect
15 ms
yarddigital.com accessibility score
yarddigital.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
yarddigital.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Yarddigital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Yarddigital.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
yarddigital.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: