Tools & Wizards About Us
zanimator.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

zanimator.net

Zanimator

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

648 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

486 ms

zanimator.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Zanimator content for Romania. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about zanimator.net

Visit zanimator.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Zanimator.net page load time and found that the first response time was 648 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

zanimator.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.zanimator.net

648 ms

css

32 ms

fb-comments-hidewpcomments-posts.css

179 ms

fb-comments-hidewpcomments-pages.css

188 ms

wp-librum.min.css

187 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Zanimator.net, 7% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (995 ms) belongs to the original domain Zanimator.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (21%)

Content Size

4.9 MB

After Optimization

3.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Zanimator.net main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 49.1 kB

  • Original 61.0 kB
  • After minification 56.3 kB
  • After compression 11.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 588.2 kB

  • Original 4.2 MB
  • After minification 3.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Zanimator needs image optimization as it can save up to 588.2 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 276.9 kB

  • Original 474.1 kB
  • After minification 468.7 kB
  • After compression 197.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 276.9 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 115.4 kB

  • Original 138.3 kB
  • After minification 114.0 kB
  • After compression 22.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zanimator.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 115.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (69%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zanimator. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.zanimator.net

www.zanimator.net

648 ms

css

css

32 ms

fb-comments-hidewpcomments-posts.css

fb-comments-hidewpcomments-posts.css

179 ms

fb-comments-hidewpcomments-pages.css

fb-comments-hidewpcomments-pages.css

188 ms

wp-librum.min.css

wp-librum.min.css

187 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

192 ms

style.css

style.css

193 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

209 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

357 ms

ytprefs.min.css

ytprefs.min.css

362 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

288 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

392 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

394 ms

ytprefs.min.js

ytprefs.min.js

395 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

136 ms

all.js

all.js

166 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

93 ms

in.js

in.js

60 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

46 ms

wp-librum.min.js

wp-librum.min.js

486 ms

fitvids.min.js

fitvids.min.js

583 ms

jquery.jplayer.min.js

jquery.jplayer.min.js

707 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

580 ms

192 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

577 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

61 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

19 ms

secureAnonymousFramework

secureAnonymousFramework

17 ms

289.jpg

289.jpg

240 ms

131.jpg

131.jpg

243 ms

42.jpg

42.jpg

353 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

529 ms

41.jpg

41.jpg

384 ms

288.jpg

288.jpg

449 ms

2132.png

2132.png

995 ms

32.png

32.png

951 ms

123.png

123.png

599 ms

22222.png

22222.png

519 ms

169 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

134 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

140 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

336 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGOHJdKliW2M9IhUT0esa8kM.woff

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGOHJdKliW2M9IhUT0esa8kM.woff

57 ms

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlDLXPPWpYIJRcQ99gLLWTOQ.woff

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlDLXPPWpYIJRcQ99gLLWTOQ.woff

78 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNF2eBBnhZOFf_rblGEjGiI.woff

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNF2eBBnhZOFf_rblGEjGiI.woff

57 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

55 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

73 ms

opacity-10.png

opacity-10.png

498 ms

s-right-s2.png

s-right-s2.png

654 ms

s-left.png

s-left.png

656 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

868 ms

collect

collect

28 ms

ca-pub-8695848769548650.js

ca-pub-8695848769548650.js

214 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

40 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

45 ms

appnext-banner.js

appnext-banner.js

88 ms

all.js

all.js

180 ms

ads

ads

37 ms

osd.js

osd.js

8 ms

119 ms

SEO Factors

zanimator.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    HR

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zanimator.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Croatian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Zanimator.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

zanimator.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Zanimator. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: