Tools & Wizards About Us
zipxpress.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    82% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

zipxpress.net

Leading LTL Carrier Based in West Michigan | www.zipxpress.net

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

69 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

483 ms

zipxpress.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Zipxpress content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about zipxpress.net

Zip Xpress is a leading LTL carrier located in West Michigan. We promise to treat your shipment with the utmost care, delivering it on time and damage free.

Visit zipxpress.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Zipxpress.net page load time and found that the first response time was 69 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

zipxpress.net performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,300 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.5 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

zipxpress.net

69 ms

www.zipxpress.net

68 ms

www.zipxpress.net

194 ms

js

89 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

50 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Zipxpress.net, 51% (40 requests) were made to 3n8lcm49l9l42l3ppt22eorl-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com and 18% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (407 ms) relates to the external source Stats.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 970.0 kB (29%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Zipxpress.net main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 53.8 kB

  • Original 69.0 kB
  • After minification 67.9 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 856.2 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Zipxpress needs image optimization as it can save up to 856.2 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 49.9 kB

  • Original 155.7 kB
  • After minification 155.7 kB
  • After compression 105.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 49.9 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 10.1 kB

  • Original 118.9 kB
  • After minification 118.2 kB
  • After compression 108.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zipxpress.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (75%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zipxpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

zipxpress.net

zipxpress.net

69 ms

www.zipxpress.net

www.zipxpress.net

68 ms

www.zipxpress.net

www.zipxpress.net

194 ms

js

js

89 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

50 ms

sp-news-public.css

sp-news-public.css

175 ms

styles.css

styles.css

174 ms

style.css

style.css

178 ms

css

css

93 ms

app.css

app.css

174 ms

easy-notification-bar.css

easy-notification-bar.css

175 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

195 ms

addtoany.min.css

addtoany.min.css

175 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

190 ms

ultimate.min.css

ultimate.min.css

245 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

192 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

241 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

234 ms

addtoany.min.js

addtoany.min.js

192 ms

jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js

jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js

234 ms

js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js

js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js

240 ms

public.js

public.js

242 ms

modernizr.custom.24530.js

modernizr.custom.24530.js

240 ms

picturefill.min.js

picturefill.min.js

240 ms

modernizr-custom.min.js

modernizr-custom.min.js

306 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

307 ms

ultimate.min.js

ultimate.min.js

311 ms

modal-all.min.js

modal-all.min.js

328 ms

embed.js

embed.js

59 ms

css

css

113 ms

css

css

135 ms

css

css

135 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

306 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

307 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

306 ms

index.js

index.js

307 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

308 ms

js

js

90 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

356 ms

wai-aria.js

wai-aria.js

355 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

356 ms

mb-YTPlayer.min.js

mb-YTPlayer.min.js

356 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

67 ms

collect

collect

259 ms

page.js

page.js

136 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

122 ms

Zip-xpress-logo-1x.png

Zip-xpress-logo-1x.png

108 ms

Customers.png

Customers.png

110 ms

amazonwalmarttesla-01.png

amazonwalmarttesla-01.png

112 ms

zip-xpress-service-map.png

zip-xpress-service-map.png

203 ms

zip-logo-2.png

zip-logo-2.png

110 ms

collect

collect

407 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

255 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

368 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

369 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdr.ttf

401 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

400 ms

gen_204

gen_204

341 ms

eso.e18d3993.js

eso.e18d3993.js

256 ms

sm.23.html

sm.23.html

332 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfo.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfo.ttf

288 ms

S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-oPCc.ttf

S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-oPCc.ttf

287 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf

287 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfo.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfo.ttf

289 ms

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_Gwfo.ttf

S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_Gwfo.ttf

292 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

291 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

290 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

293 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

294 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

292 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

256 ms

zip-xpress-service-map.png

zip-xpress-service-map.png

236 ms

image.png

image.png

238 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

161 ms

cross.png

cross.png

53 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

127 ms

identity.js

identity.js

17 ms

1143543812406491

1143543812406491

81 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

24 ms

Accessibility Review

zipxpress.net accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

zipxpress.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

zipxpress.net SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zipxpress.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Zipxpress.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

zipxpress.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Zipxpress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: