5 sec in total
812 ms
3.5 sec
621 ms
Visit zircool.ru now to see the best up-to-date Zircool content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about zircool.ru
Блог 1С и Bitrix разработчика
Visit zircool.ruWe analyzed Zircool.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 812 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
zircool.ru performance score
812 ms
131 ms
259 ms
513 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Zircool.ru, 9% (5 requests) were made to Openstat.net and 7% (4 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Zircool.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (65%)
2.3 MB
826.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Zircool.ru main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 106.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Zircool needs image optimization as it can save up to 106.3 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 301.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zircool.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 301.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (53%)
49
23
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zircool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
zircool.ru
812 ms
kernel_main.css
131 ms
page_569ed51988f89637219bff9617267e4f.css
259 ms
template_ef6760ada6b4b604303e772ace36cd10.css
513 ms
zircool
26 ms
kernel_main.js
568 ms
core_db.min.js
277 ms
core_frame_cache.min.js
288 ms
template_299beec7369a386415df812fc75475cf.js
916 ms
jquery.peity.min.js
364 ms
inspinia.js
404 ms
pace.min.js
435 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
739 ms
jquery.gritter.min.js
565 ms
jquery.easypiechart.js
580 ms
jquery.sparkline.min.js
634 ms
sparkline-demo.js
867 ms
Chart.min.js
663 ms
responsible-video.js
721 ms
top100.jcn
387 ms
logo.png
761 ms
e07d3187e874a9f9a47a615d11944252.png
1103 ms
10fe8d3909e137ded9fe878457308ffb.png
1704 ms
c8140dfa9d69253c3177aea2850f7f3c.JPEG
860 ms
0329a604d6de320c1a8fa340767ed9c9.jpg
889 ms
500e2ec165059ab40907f0c290bc2f91.png
990 ms
64ac4dcb9f868cb9ec01b419b50bbf81.png
997 ms
f077f49971d25439ac0d851e1b618eee.gif
1145 ms
203b953e27fa286a8fece24bfe1ef938.png
1100 ms
141c16077ce08b7fc50dce4eef35914f.png
1115 ms
36e92c12d35d9d0b5816c1915a0cdd5c.png
1116 ms
17e4cdf41758e1fd01faa85204c901d0.jpg
1216 ms
4543e1e4d7791c160b319fe317a290b5.png
1211 ms
dmoz.jpg
1230 ms
header-profile.png
704 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
713 ms
cnt.js
252 ms
2371650.js
156 ms
ba.js
164 ms
cnt
126 ms
watch.js
183 ms
analytics.js
53 ms
top100.scn
372 ms
hit
274 ms
2470441.js
258 ms
core.js
518 ms
collect
18 ms
f.gif
126 ms
bx_stat
217 ms
watch.js
436 ms
cnt
126 ms
advert.gif
85 ms
pixel
23 ms
pixel
18 ms
collect
173 ms
1
85 ms
hotlog_redirects
199 ms
zircool.ru SEO score
![]()
RU
![]()
N/A
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zircool.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Zircool.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
zircool.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Zircool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: