4.6 sec in total
686 ms
3.7 sec
208 ms
Visit 100cgi.com now to see the best up-to-date 100CGI content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 100cgi.com
Expert 3D visualizations & VR for architecture. Transforming concepts into immersive experiences with 100CGI Studio's cutting-edge technology.
Visit 100cgi.comWe analyzed 100cgi.com page load time and found that the first response time was 686 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
100cgi.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
17/100
10%
Value4.5 s
38/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value310 ms
77/100
30%
Value1.014
2/100
15%
Value7.8 s
45/100
10%
686 ms
57 ms
24 ms
446 ms
390 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original 100cgi.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Px.ads.linkedin.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain 100cgi.com.
Page size can be reduced by 74.8 kB (17%)
451.1 kB
376.2 kB
In fact, the total size of 100cgi.com main page is 451.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 209.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 68.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 205 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 100CGI images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 852 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 100cgi.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (80%)
54
11
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 100CGI. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
100cgi.com
686 ms
gtm.js
57 ms
jquery.min.js
24 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
446 ms
2bvsc.css
390 ms
2bvsb.css
475 ms
2bvsb.css
441 ms
2bvsb.css
34 ms
2bvsb.css
438 ms
2bvsb.css
37 ms
2bvsb.css
50 ms
2bvsb.css
73 ms
2bvsb.css
73 ms
2bvsb.css
86 ms
2bvsb.css
97 ms
2bvsb.css
108 ms
2bvsb.css
116 ms
2bvsb.css
134 ms
2bvsb.css
145 ms
2bvsb.css
154 ms
2bvsb.css
170 ms
2bvsb.css
180 ms
2bvsb.css
191 ms
2bvsb.css
201 ms
2bvsb.css
213 ms
2bvsg.js
850 ms
2bvsf.js
396 ms
2bvsf.js
861 ms
2bvsf.js
893 ms
2bvsf.js
809 ms
2bvsf.js
1033 ms
2bvsf.js
843 ms
2bvsf.js
1180 ms
2bvse.js
1211 ms
2bvse.js
863 ms
2bvse.js
1396 ms
2bvse.js
872 ms
2bvsd.js
885 ms
2bvsd.js
894 ms
2bvsd.js
1238 ms
2bvsd.js
877 ms
2bvsd.js
874 ms
2bvsc.js
861 ms
insight.min.js
40 ms
2bvsc.js
860 ms
2bvsc.js
868 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
30 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
85 ms
web_logo_01-e1647335482328.png
372 ms
u_instagram2.png
380 ms
vimeo-12.png
498 ms
blank.gif
14 ms
bg-1.png
11 ms
Mask-Group-1.png
12 ms
100cgi.com
602 ms
kaine_regular-webfont.woff
468 ms
playfairdisplay-bold-webfont.woff
909 ms
playfairdisplay-regular-webfont.woff
1146 ms
avenirnextcyr-regular.ttf
667 ms
avenirnextcyr-medium.ttf
626 ms
avenirnextcyr-demi.ttf
241 ms
avenirnextcyr-bold.ttf
543 ms
avenirnextcyr-thin.ttf
554 ms
100cgi.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
100cgi.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
100cgi.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 100cgi.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 100cgi.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
100cgi.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 100CGI. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: