Tools & Wizards About Us
17track.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 47

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

17track.net

ALL-IN-ONE PACKAGE TRACKING | 17TRACK

Page Load Speed

66.2 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

64.7 sec

Page Rendered

299 ms

17track.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing 17TRACK content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 17track.net

17TRACK is the most powerful and inclusive package tracking platform. It enables to track over 170+ postal carriers for registered mail, parcel, EMS and multiple express couriers such as DHL, Fedex, U...

Visit 17track.net

Key Findings

We analyzed 17track.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 65 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 11 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

17track.net performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,150 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.7 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

17track.net

1212 ms

www.17track.net

7213 ms

en

3033 ms

fontcarrier

2894 ms

basepagecss

3622 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original 17track.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) belongs to the original domain 17track.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 509.8 kB (49%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

522.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of 17track.net main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 403.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 252.3 kB

  • Original 330.6 kB
  • After minification 330.5 kB
  • After compression 78.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 252.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 297.8 kB
  • After minification 297.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 17TRACK images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 257.4 kB

  • Original 403.5 kB
  • After minification 403.5 kB
  • After compression 146.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 257.4 kB or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (34%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 17TRACK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

17track.net

17track.net

1212 ms

www.17track.net

www.17track.net

7213 ms

en

en

3033 ms

fontcarrier

fontcarrier

2894 ms

basepagecss

basepagecss

3622 ms

homepagecss

homepagecss

3203 ms

logo_full_en_light.png

logo_full_en_light.png

1962 ms

phone.png

phone.png

20293 ms

basepagejs

basepagejs

14181 ms

homepagejslang_en

homepagejslang_en

11128 ms

homepagejs

homepagejs

10000 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

1333 ms

logo_circular_light_64.png

logo_circular_light_64.png

1330 ms

logo_icon_128.png

logo_icon_128.png

1584 ms

logo_square_light_64.png

logo_square_light_64.png

1727 ms

line.png

line.png

880 ms

banner_bg7.jpg

banner_bg7.jpg

19581 ms

search_input.png

search_input.png

1309 ms

ex_190008.jpg

ex_190008.jpg

2640 ms

ex_190002.jpg

ex_190002.jpg

4476 ms

ex_190015.jpg

ex_190015.jpg

6263 ms

ex_190012.jpg

ex_190012.jpg

9445 ms

ex_190011.jpg

ex_190011.jpg

11085 ms

ex_190003.jpg

ex_190003.jpg

12358 ms

ex_100011.jpg

ex_100011.jpg

11361 ms

ex_190021.jpg

ex_190021.jpg

14697 ms

ex_190018.jpg

ex_190018.jpg

13753 ms

ex_100012.jpg

ex_100012.jpg

13758 ms

ex_100020.jpg

ex_100020.jpg

15157 ms

ex_100001.jpg

ex_100001.jpg

16248 ms

ex_100002.jpg

ex_100002.jpg

15689 ms

search_bg.jpg

search_bg.jpg

19575 ms

button_03.png

button_03.png

17128 ms

map3.png

map3.png

16694 ms

opensans_regular_webfont.woff

opensans_regular_webfont.woff

20381 ms

opensans_lightitalic_webfont.woff

opensans_lightitalic_webfont.woff

19558 ms

opensans_light_webfont.woff

opensans_light_webfont.woff

20380 ms

opensans_semibold_webfont.woff

opensans_semibold_webfont.woff

19502 ms

opensans_bold_webfont.woff

opensans_bold_webfont.woff

20380 ms

opensans_extrabold_webfont.woff

opensans_extrabold_webfont.woff

20380 ms

fontawesome_webfont.woff

fontawesome_webfont.woff

20380 ms

carrier.ttf

carrier.ttf

20380 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

146 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

140 ms

query

query

9897 ms

welcome.png

welcome.png

8573 ms

pubads_impl_83.js

pubads_impl_83.js

94 ms

collect

collect

191 ms

collect

collect

257 ms

ads

ads

477 ms

container.html

container.html

103 ms

opensans_semibold_webfont.ttf

opensans_semibold_webfont.ttf

19681 ms

opensans_regular_webfont.ttf

opensans_regular_webfont.ttf

7226 ms

opensans_light_webfont.ttf

opensans_light_webfont.ttf

3531 ms

opensans_bold_webfont.ttf

opensans_bold_webfont.ttf

12427 ms

opensans_extrabold_webfont.ttf

opensans_extrabold_webfont.ttf

4390 ms

fontawesome_webfont.ttf

fontawesome_webfont.ttf

9514 ms

carrier.woff

carrier.woff

19859 ms

query

query

2002 ms

opensans_semibold_webfont.svg

opensans_semibold_webfont.svg

11710 ms

carrier.svg

carrier.svg

11211 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

73 ms

sh.953eb77977227bfd253ee158.html

sh.953eb77977227bfd253ee158.html

50 ms

Accessibility Review

17track.net accessibility score

47

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

17track.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

17track.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 17track.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that 17track.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

17track.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 17TRACK. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: