Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

1v1.fail

1v1.LOL | Building Simulator, Battle Royale & Shooting Game

Page Load Speed

692 ms in total

First Response

36 ms

Resources Loaded

578 ms

Page Rendered

78 ms

1v1.fail screenshot

About Website

Visit 1v1.fail now to see the best up-to-date 1 V content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 1v1.fail

Discover 1v1, the online building simulator & third person shooting game. Battle royale, build fight, box fight, zone wars and more game modes to enjoy!

Visit 1v1.fail

Key Findings

We analyzed 1v1.fail page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 656 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

1v1.fail performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.096

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

1v1.fail

36 ms

js

124 ms

googleAnalytics.js

26 ms

jquery.min.js

105 ms

mobileRedirect.js

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original 1v1.fail, 19% (7 requests) were made to Ssl.cdne.cpmstar.com and 14% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (480 ms) relates to the external source Gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 16.7 kB (3%)

Content Size

628.7 kB

After Optimization

612.0 kB

In fact, the total size of 1v1.fail main page is 628.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 598.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 14.9 kB
  • After minification 14.0 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 15.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 598.1 kB
  • After minification 598.1 kB
  • After compression 592.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (83%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 1 V. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

1v1.fail accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

1v1.fail best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

1v1.fail SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 1v1.fail can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 1v1.fail main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 1 V. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: