Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

2l.no

2L - the Nordic Sound

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

309 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

132 ms

2l.no screenshot

About Website

Welcome to 2l.no homepage info - get ready to check 2L best content for Netherlands right away, or after learning these important things about 2l.no

The music captured by 2L features Norwegian composers and performers and an international repertoire reflected in the Nordic atmosphere. The surround sound recordings of Lindberg Lyd not only transfor...

Visit 2l.no

Key Findings

We analyzed 2l.no page load time and found that the first response time was 309 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

2l.no performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

72/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

2l.no

309 ms

www.2l.no

358 ms

widgets.js

15 ms

2L-the-Nordic-sound.jpg

234 ms

2L106.jpg

235 ms

Our browser made a total of 137 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (130 requests) were addressed to the original 2l.no, 2% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain 2l.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 79.5 kB (4%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of 2l.no main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 22.4 kB
  • After minification 21.4 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 60.9 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 2L images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

135

After Optimization

135

The browser has sent 135 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 2L. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

2l.no accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

2l.no best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

2l.no SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 2l.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that 2l.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 2L. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: