4.1 sec in total
155 ms
3.6 sec
328 ms
Visit 4fox.in now to see the best up-to-date 4FOX content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 4fox.in
4FOX Solutions is the one of best IT company in india located in Nashik. We are specialist in website design and development, branding, creative design, SEO, SEM/PPC, Mobile App services and blockchai...
Visit 4fox.inWe analyzed 4fox.in page load time and found that the first response time was 155 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
4fox.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
17/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value7.2 s
30/100
10%
Value2,730 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value11.4 s
19/100
10%
155 ms
63 ms
78 ms
47 ms
49 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original 4fox.in, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain 4fox.in.
Page size can be reduced by 138.0 kB (70%)
197.7 kB
59.7 kB
In fact, the total size of 4fox.in main page is 197.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 97.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.4 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 46% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 81.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 4fox.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 81.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (59%)
51
21
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 4FOX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.4fox.in
155 ms
config.js.php
63 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
78 ms
jquery.queryloader2.js
47 ms
common.inc.js
49 ms
fxdialog.inc.js
48 ms
site.inc.js
49 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js
123 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
71 ms
jquery.jcarousel.js
117 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
117 ms
jquery.tweet.js
90 ms
jquery.quicksand.js
115 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
90 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
90 ms
responsive-nav.js
110 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
109 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
160 ms
jquery.jsonSuggest-2.js
162 ms
flickr.js
164 ms
custom.js
164 ms
style.css
2465 ms
light.css
1646 ms
backgrounds.css
162 ms
green.css
2083 ms
responsive-nav.css
1644 ms
colorbox.css
1649 ms
flexslider.css
1651 ms
main-flexslider.css
2402 ms
font-awesome.min.css
2425 ms
css
25 ms
google_analytics_auto.js
2374 ms
ga.js
66 ms
big_logo.png
137 ms
background_02.jpg
635 ms
project_01.jpg
247 ms
project_05.jpg
265 ms
project_07.jpg
201 ms
project_06.jpg
194 ms
prev-arrow.png
231 ms
next-arrow.png
233 ms
0014404001400934771.png
661 ms
0370336001400934429.png
857 ms
0757834001400934376.png
858 ms
client.png
754 ms
white-bubble-speech.png
753 ms
analytics.js
80 ms
blockquote-bg.png
689 ms
main-prev-arrow_black.png
567 ms
main-next-arrow_black.png
631 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
60 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
61 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
62 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
62 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
61 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
692 ms
__utm.gif
22 ms
collect
14 ms
4fox.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
4fox.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
4fox.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 4fox.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that 4fox.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
4fox.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 4FOX. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: