3.8 sec in total
305 ms
3 sec
486 ms
Visit 4qsurvey.com now to see the best up-to-date 4 Qsurvey content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 4qsurvey.com
4Q is the best way to evaluate the online experience, measure customer satisfaction and quickly implement website improvements based on real customer feedback.
Visit 4qsurvey.comWe analyzed 4qsurvey.com page load time and found that the first response time was 305 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
4qsurvey.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
6/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value5.6 s
52/100
10%
Value1,360 ms
16/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.9 s
21/100
10%
305 ms
187 ms
178 ms
180 ms
184 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original 4qsurvey.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Static.hsstatic.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Cdn2.hubspot.net.
Page size can be reduced by 495.4 kB (59%)
843.0 kB
347.6 kB
In fact, the total size of 4qsurvey.com main page is 843.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 503.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 85 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 4 Qsurvey images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 296.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 296.7 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 120.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 4qsurvey.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 120.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (66%)
76
26
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 4 Qsurvey. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
4q
305 ms
jquery-1.11.2.js
187 ms
public_common.css
178 ms
layout.min.css
180 ms
iPerceptions_Oct2015-style.min.css
184 ms
simpletabs_1.3.js
345 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
343 ms
iPerceptions_Oct2015-main.min.js
343 ms
public_common.js
341 ms
gtm.js
351 ms
css
145 ms
font-awesome.min.css
119 ms
logo-1.png
43 ms
4QLogoL.png
662 ms
usersT.png
272 ms
shoppingBasketS.png
660 ms
checkmarkS.png
661 ms
toolsS.png
1152 ms
SeamlessSetup.jpg
658 ms
GA-1.jpg
654 ms
32Languages.jpg
1059 ms
Avinash.jpg
1056 ms
mobile-tabletS.png
1158 ms
magnifyingGlassL.png
1383 ms
CC.jpg
1278 ms
icn_facebook.png
1153 ms
icn_gplus.png
1226 ms
icn_linkedin.png
1267 ms
icn_twitter.png
1276 ms
icn_youtube.png
1271 ms
footer_phone.png
1357 ms
footer_email.png
1373 ms
seal.png
1358 ms
dss.png
1356 ms
comodo.png
1372 ms
footer_email.png
1281 ms
arrowSeparatorNarrow.png
1311 ms
PNG_Image_2122_pixels.png
1342 ms
PNG_Image_2021_pixels.png
1484 ms
mini_dots.png
1324 ms
footer_separator.png
1277 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
396 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
567 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
734 ms
Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
733 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
786 ms
mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
787 ms
469164.js
920 ms
conversion_async.js
867 ms
roundtrip.js
942 ms
analytics.js
824 ms
wrapper.js
945 ms
iperceptions_lib.js
935 ms
74e7ea09-44b3-407d-91b6-328490c7aa77.js
791 ms
insight.min.js
876 ms
close.png
845 ms
tag.js
781 ms
670.html
765 ms
WRf4.js
134 ms
collect
192 ms
collect
266 ms
230 ms
adgear.js
101 ms
.jsonp
364 ms
151 ms
54CPOMQFOBHUBC4ZYJ5S5V.js
67 ms
chip=447a9d400f66013259700024e87a30c2.gif
430 ms
fbevents.hashing.js
464 ms
out
20 ms
108 ms
u.php
416 ms
263 ms
sync
414 ms
storage.min.html
334 ms
62069240
281 ms
zones
321 ms
tap.php
80 ms
79 ms
in
9 ms
sd
16 ms
377928.gif
16 ms
1215.gif
10 ms
UISuite.js
131 ms
overlay.js
161 ms
179
52 ms
62069240
42 ms
pixel
22 ms
13 ms
4qsurvey.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
4qsurvey.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
4qsurvey.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 4qsurvey.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 4qsurvey.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
4qsurvey.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 4 Qsurvey. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: