Tools & Wizards About Us
80-35.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

80-35.com

80/35 2024

Page Load Speed

520 ms in total

First Response

53 ms

Resources Loaded

297 ms

Page Rendered

170 ms

80-35.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to 80-35.com homepage info - get ready to check 80 35 best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about 80-35.com

Visit 80-35.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 80-35.com page load time and found that the first response time was 53 ms and then it took 467 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

80-35.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value33,980 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value52.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

80-35.com

53 ms

www.80-35.com

99 ms

2016.80-35.com

101 ms

styles.min.css

4 ms

analytics.js

7 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original 80-35.com, 69% (9 requests) were made to 2016.80-35.com and 15% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (101 ms) relates to the external source 2016.80-35.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 101.2 kB (18%)

Content Size

558.6 kB

After Optimization

457.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 80-35.com main page is 558.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 500.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 2.1 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB
  • After compression 786 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 63% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 66.2 kB

  • Original 500.9 kB
  • After minification 434.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, 80 35 needs image optimization as it can save up to 66.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 52.9 kB
  • After minification 52.9 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.6 kB
  • After compression 925 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 80-35.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 80 35. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

80-35.com

80-35.com

53 ms

www.80-35.com

www.80-35.com

99 ms

2016.80-35.com

2016.80-35.com

101 ms

styles.min.css

styles.min.css

4 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

7 ms

logo.png

logo.png

28 ms

tixonsale.png

tixonsale.png

25 ms

billboard.png

billboard.png

28 ms

tix2.png

tix2.png

26 ms

socialbadges2.png

socialbadges2.png

27 ms

emails.png

emails.png

25 ms

past.png

past.png

24 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

Accessibility Review

80-35.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

80-35.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

80-35.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 80-35.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that 80-35.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

80-35.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 80 35. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: