1.1 sec in total
33 ms
889 ms
170 ms
Welcome to 86borders.com homepage info - get ready to check 86Borders best content right away, or after learning these important things about 86borders.com
Connect with your most vulnerable members to close care gaps and improve Star Ratings.
Visit 86borders.comWe analyzed 86borders.com page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
86borders.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value6.1 s
44/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.7 s
46/100
10%
33 ms
51 ms
30 ms
29 ms
39 ms
Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (96 requests) were addressed to the original 86borders.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Google.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (217 ms) belongs to the original domain 86borders.com.
Page size can be reduced by 246.8 kB (58%)
428.9 kB
182.1 kB
In fact, the total size of 86borders.com main page is 428.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 223.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 86Borders images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 149.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 149.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 86borders.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.7 kB or 33% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 82 (82%)
100
18
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 86Borders. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 55 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
86borders.com
33 ms
51 ms
main4.css
30 ms
vh_align.css
29 ms
vht_align.css
39 ms
table.css
40 ms
tabs.css
36 ms
chat.css
35 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
41 ms
jquery.multiselect.css
45 ms
jquery.ui.selectmenu.css
45 ms
roboto.css
45 ms
muli.css
40 ms
exotwo.css
39 ms
icomoon.css
45 ms
icomoon2.css
46 ms
settings_widgets.css
46 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
56 ms
jquery.spin.css
55 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
70 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js
111 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js-minifier.js
61 ms
tools.js
62 ms
jquery.custom.js
93 ms
phonenumbers-compiled.js
144 ms
jquery.tools.part.js
101 ms
jquery.msgbox.min.js
90 ms
websocket.tools.js
108 ms
jquery.spin.js
140 ms
heightcontrol.js
141 ms
groupmenu.js
141 ms
groupsection.js
168 ms
theme.js
170 ms
unload.js
167 ms
listboxfilterclass.js
172 ms
listboxcardclass.js
176 ms
listboxselectorclass.js
174 ms
api.js
43 ms
head5.css
172 ms
footer3.css
153 ms
wic.styles.css
154 ms
notifications.js
153 ms
onebox.js
152 ms
widgets.js
150 ms
groupprofile.js
156 ms
DSChat.js
155 ms
Math.uuid.js
154 ms
jquery.multiselect.js
155 ms
jquery.ui.selectmenu.js
155 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js
156 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
158 ms
player.js
155 ms
ui.tools.js
163 ms
jquery.backgroundpos.js
160 ms
jquery-cookie-plugin.js
147 ms
jquery.cookies.js
152 ms
widgets.manager.js
154 ms
widgets.grid.js
181 ms
newsfeeds.js
125 ms
hello.js
153 ms
wicRTC.js
130 ms
wicRTCWebCall.js
124 ms
chateventlistener.js
121 ms
manage.menu.js
97 ms
geolocation.js
100 ms
blowfish.js
117 ms
backButtonProcessor.js
91 ms
SIPml-api.js
217 ms
wrap.sipml5.js
91 ms
wrap.webrtc.js
89 ms
WICModule.nocache.js
88 ms
jquery.blockUI.js
88 ms
msb_front_page_beta_logo_small.png
11 ms
close3.png
11 ms
snippetcustom.faces
11 ms
ic_menu_downarrow.svg
14 ms
callcenterchatui.js
38 ms
icomoon2.woff
17 ms
main_page.png
106 ms
linkedin.png
23 ms
twitter.png
35 ms
facebook.png
33 ms
blog.png
40 ms
SignUpLI.png
39 ms
SignInLI.png
72 ms
linkedin_logo_black_popup_ic.png
73 ms
recaptcha__en.js
44 ms
linkedin_footer.png
69 ms
twitter_footer.png
69 ms
facebook_footer.png
70 ms
blog_footer.png
80 ms
css
63 ms
callcenterchatui.css
64 ms
adapter.debug.js
75 ms
Sexy.min.js
76 ms
ccsui_en.js
76 ms
adapter.debug.js
120 ms
easyXDM.min.js
122 ms
undefined.cache.js
51 ms
anchor
28 ms
styles__ltr.css
7 ms
-FHGegChvKELgmHNPF97Aj33qC9PBXl7UyexHItfpAU.js
13 ms
webworker.js
52 ms
logo_48.png
12 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
52 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
57 ms
86borders.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
86borders.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
86borders.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 86borders.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that 86borders.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
86borders.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 86Borders. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: