2.2 sec in total
12 ms
1.7 sec
534 ms
Visit adobe.io now to see the best up-to-date Adobe content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about adobe.io
The most memorable digital experiences are unleashed by developer creativity. Adobe products and services empower developers.
Visit adobe.ioWe analyzed Adobe.io page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
adobe.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value3,890 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value11.5 s
19/100
10%
12 ms
83 ms
176 ms
82 ms
157 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 26% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Adobe.io, 23% (13 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 14% (8 requests) were made to Assets.adobedtm.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Adobe.io.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (61%)
1.7 MB
647.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Adobe.io main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Adobe needs image optimization as it can save up to 54.6 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 723.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 723.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 198.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Adobe.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 198.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (58%)
43
18
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adobe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
adobe.io
12 ms
www.adobe.io
83 ms
bootstrap.min.css
176 ms
globalnav.css
82 ms
adobe-io.css
157 ms
syw4gxc.js
148 ms
globalnav.js
87 ms
app.js
158 ms
satelliteLib-46e65db5bb0c375f8f64619be31cc9b29acf4867.js
71 ms
imslib.min.js
49 ms
www.adobe.io
109 ms
image_user_mgt.png
55 ms
image_CC.png
72 ms
image_mc_dev_con.png
54 ms
image_target.jpg
1328 ms
banner_1920.png
595 ms
bookmark.png
57 ms
icon_user_mgt.png
252 ms
icon_CC.png
253 ms
icon_mc_dev_con.png
254 ms
icon_target_2.png
253 ms
mbox-contents-f3808f72f280c66c15bd81363d6f55f0659a684d.js
30 ms
dil-contents-fe044508f2e9fdd5937011e33188cb0afb585dac.js
104 ms
ip.json
350 ms
ip.json
351 ms
target.js
253 ms
globalnav.js
67 ms
token
110 ms
rd
73 ms
PtEwHacYD28fOlo1vysGCJ_lFeS-sU2GsINS9xxMr1qffwrpgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mb.woff
165 ms
LGTM8R7hSxQm3Os2zJcudzNKHQIkexgAk7j6XISr80CffwhpgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mw.woff
247 ms
I8y6tnQUxVZdufm0vYbzYXj3Fh5cPUmhXqPkQtZDTpCffFepgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5MS.woff
368 ms
R5UVdSvAcih1Fr2NgXBS_y6A6gW-Zh5wotb8UPUie2tffOELgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mt.woff
413 ms
PXu9jSTWZPHIae5EseT1Y3k9DNKfNtGzS5f8YPYKEPqffwfLgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5gI.woff
410 ms
lzepbKUcqDJqBWCD3WgmrTK5QtPjREoe_ijGGhfy5yjffOhLgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mb.woff
411 ms
CJvV9TgIrJSYxg0crQZEEBLg1xJBFtcX_raU-Kp71IjffOrLgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5MS.woff
414 ms
sUjCj1LERCMo7AKBFm9xEF79gebkEHolglaTQrBXNH9ffH5bgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mt.woff
411 ms
kZsmjKM6AHdI0ZRQJ5CIVbj2AQjOi4eE62YZGuJYU-9ffHAbgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5gI.woff
409 ms
QdtMYtN0cJu2bu2WyKw9xHSkUDeDL7hAd80SPmumKztffHHbgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mb.woff
479 ms
94a2VVz2aPnZlQOLp3LaCxAJYNYAchsKSM_GydlNbWbffHPbgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5MS.woff
479 ms
ajax
353 ms
id
256 ms
favicon.ico
251 ms
satellite-565f3e0c64746d342a002ac9.js
65 ms
s-code-contents-146a88b4f5fddb2d4e0e17e6c6a6c926b4926272.js
231 ms
id
62 ms
p.gif
145 ms
s77593070331495
31 ms
s75412349635735
28 ms
standard
37 ms
event
45 ms
s76960145509801
12 ms
dest5.html
18 ms
satellite-534da2e96b8ae7c6840004b9.js
18 ms
satellite-5359ac4ecd812179a60007a7.js
21 ms
satellite-54133e4209c7a707dc0001c5.js
17 ms
dest4.html
21 ms
adobe.io accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
adobe.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Registers an unload listener
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
adobe.io SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adobe.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Adobe.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
adobe.io
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Adobe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: