Report Summary

  • 6

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

allur.co

Coming Soon

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

322 ms

allur.co screenshot

About Website

Visit allur.co now to see the best up-to-date Allur content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about allur.co

Allur specialize in the design and development of custom websites and Wordpress themes. If you need a site and you are wondering what is Wordpress, you can

Visit allur.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Allur.co page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

allur.co performance score

6

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,400 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.29

41/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

allur.co

1545 ms

ga.js

31 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

162 ms

prettyPhoto.css

202 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

139 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Allur.co, 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Cdn.jquerytools.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Allur.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 394.0 kB (24%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Allur.co main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 36.9 kB

  • Original 44.3 kB
  • After minification 35.7 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.7 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.7 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Allur images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 257.9 kB

  • Original 395.2 kB
  • After minification 377.4 kB
  • After compression 137.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 257.9 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 88.5 kB

  • Original 105.1 kB
  • After minification 86.0 kB
  • After compression 16.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Allur.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 88.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (53%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Allur. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

allur.co accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

allur.co best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

allur.co SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Allur.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Allur.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Allur. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: