4.8 sec in total
1.5 sec
3 sec
254 ms
Visit amscaffold.com now to see the best up-to-date Amscaffold content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about amscaffold.com
Benefit From The Expertise Of Aluminum Scaffolding and Aluminum Ladders Manufacturer in UAE - Aluminum Mobile Scaffold. Let Us Know What You Need – Contact Us.
Visit amscaffold.comWe analyzed Amscaffold.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
amscaffold.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
45/100
10%
Value6.4 s
9/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value930 ms
30/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.2 s
12/100
10%
1542 ms
61 ms
33 ms
130 ms
130 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Amscaffold.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Amscaffold.com.
Page size can be reduced by 190.9 kB (18%)
1.1 MB
899.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Amscaffold.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 450.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 116.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 47.3 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Amscaffold images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 65.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.2 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Amscaffold.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (69%)
75
23
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Amscaffold. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
amscaffold.com
1542 ms
gtm.js
61 ms
css
33 ms
ultimate-tables.css
130 ms
all.min.css
130 ms
swipebox.css
130 ms
hover-pack.css
134 ms
img-gallery.css
135 ms
style.min.css
249 ms
styles.css
239 ms
social-icons.css
238 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css
239 ms
bootstrap.min.css
262 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
256 ms
animate.min.css
255 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
254 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
267 ms
owl.theme.default.css
308 ms
cubeportfolio.css
319 ms
font-awesome.css
316 ms
style.css
318 ms
jquery.min.js
327 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
337 ms
hover-pack.js
368 ms
jquery.swipebox.js
378 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
377 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
377 ms
js
68 ms
js
70 ms
css
22 ms
rs6.css
194 ms
jquery.dataTables.js
251 ms
index.js
197 ms
index.js
249 ms
rbtools.min.js
333 ms
rs6.min.js
336 ms
wpcf7r-fe.js
250 ms
dlm-xhr.min.js
332 ms
bootstrap.min.js
333 ms
wow.min.js
332 ms
waypoints.min.js
333 ms
jquery.counterup.js
333 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
334 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
334 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.js
366 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
409 ms
jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js
414 ms
main-two-col.js
416 ms
default.js
451 ms
comment-reply.min.js
415 ms
js
50 ms
js
51 ms
logo-1.png
398 ms
dummy.png
268 ms
two-way.jpg
343 ms
platform-alu-ladder.jpg
347 ms
ladder1-1.jpg
345 ms
multi-task.jpg
346 ms
dw250-double-width-aluminium-scaffolding.jpg
344 ms
sw180-single-width.jpg
346 ms
podium-aluminium-steps-home-1.jpg
397 ms
k.jpg
396 ms
futtaim-client.jpg
394 ms
scaffco-client.jpg
395 ms
al-faraa-client.jpg
395 ms
delmon-client.jpg
397 ms
trojan-client.jpg
445 ms
banner1.png
642 ms
analytics.js
123 ms
Roboto-Regular.woff
442 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
404 ms
Roboto-Bold.woff
412 ms
Lora-Regular.woff
412 ms
93 ms
164 ms
161 ms
collect
126 ms
cbp-loading.gif
990 ms
57 ms
collect
93 ms
ga-audiences
30 ms
amscaffold.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
amscaffold.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
amscaffold.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Amscaffold.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Amscaffold.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
amscaffold.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Amscaffold. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: