1.9 sec in total
108 ms
1.4 sec
373 ms
Click here to check amazing Aquila content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about aquila.technology
Aquila Technology provides technology solutions and skilled teams to help manage challenges faced by the defense and cybersecurity sectors.
Visit aquila.technologyWe analyzed Aquila.technology page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
aquila.technology performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value7.6 s
3/100
25%
Value11.3 s
5/100
10%
Value980 ms
28/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value13.0 s
13/100
10%
108 ms
198 ms
90 ms
36 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Aquila.technology, 16% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (417 ms) belongs to the original domain Aquila.technology.
Page size can be reduced by 82.1 kB (5%)
1.7 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Aquila.technology main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 879.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Aquila images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aquila.technology has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (65%)
57
20
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aquila. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
aquila.technology
108 ms
aquila.technology
198 ms
js
90 ms
js_composer.min.css
36 ms
layerslider.css
30 ms
css
85 ms
style.min.css
26 ms
settings.css
77 ms
job-listings.css
68 ms
style.css
354 ms
css
119 ms
wpex-visual-composer.css
69 ms
wpex-layerslider.css
83 ms
jquery.min.js
83 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
83 ms
layerslider.utils.js
82 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
82 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
116 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
114 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
115 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
116 ms
lightbox.min.css
104 ms
animate.min.css
106 ms
v4-shims.min.css
417 ms
all.min.css
109 ms
total.min.js
108 ms
api.js
106 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
108 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
109 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
147 ms
index.js
145 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
146 ms
skrollr.min.js
144 ms
lightbox.min.js
147 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
147 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
150 ms
underscore.min.js
148 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
148 ms
vc_grid.min.js
148 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
148 ms
Aquila-Logo.png
27 ms
Aquila_slider_1.jpg
60 ms
Aquila_slider_2-1.jpg
60 ms
Aquila_slider_3.jpg
61 ms
dashed-overlay.png
59 ms
cybersecurity_thumbnail-color-2.jpg
58 ms
sys_thumbnail-color-2.jpg
294 ms
informationAssurance_thumbnail-color-2.jpg
65 ms
networkEngineering_thumbnail-color-2.jpg
64 ms
softwareDesign_thumbnail-color-2.jpg
64 ms
test_thumbnail-color-2.jpg
63 ms
aquila-logo-123px-white.png
63 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
291 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
293 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
320 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
321 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
321 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
320 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf
262 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
261 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexQ.ttf
306 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk_RkWVAexQ.ttf
305 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
306 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf
306 ms
ticons-webfont.woff
306 ms
recaptcha__en.js
252 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
417 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
324 ms
technology2-1500px-opt.jpg
61 ms
contact-parallax-sm_opt.jpg
103 ms
prev.png
239 ms
next.png
239 ms
loading.gif
106 ms
close.png
106 ms
aquila.technology accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
aquila.technology best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
aquila.technology SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aquila.technology can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Aquila.technology main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
aquila.technology
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Aquila. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: