2.2 sec in total
92 ms
1.9 sec
221 ms
Click here to check amazing Art People content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about artpeople.net
ArtPeople.Net For Artists
Visit artpeople.netWe analyzed Artpeople.net page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
artpeople.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value1,490 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.022
100/100
15%
Value14.1 s
9/100
10%
92 ms
118 ms
114 ms
60 ms
67 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Artpeople.net, 43% (40 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 18% (17 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (607 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.8 MB (76%)
3.7 MB
892.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Artpeople.net main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 268.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 268.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Art People needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.1 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.5 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.5 MB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Artpeople.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 65.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (70%)
82
25
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Art People. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
artpeople.net
92 ms
www.artpeople.net
118 ms
bt
114 ms
require.min.js
60 ms
main-r.min.js
67 ms
viewer.css
65 ms
dynamicmodel
29 ms
63bc8b_c68f71fb82ab665a598cd0d328956044_1259.json.z
375 ms
63bc8b_9189bcb62bbe4eeb2a8efc924acae7df_1259.json.z
370 ms
ugc-viewer
112 ms
bt
357 ms
skins.min.js
127 ms
components.min.js
127 ms
utils.min.js
27 ms
core.min.js
123 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
123 ms
lodash.min.js
24 ms
TweenMax.min.js
121 ms
layout.min.js
104 ms
tpa.min.js
126 ms
fonts.min.js
127 ms
animations.min.js
124 ms
swfobject.min.js
123 ms
mousetrap.min.js
121 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
122 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
124 ms
react-dom.min.js
123 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
123 ms
widgets.min.js
124 ms
experiment.js
125 ms
render.min.js
124 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
339 ms
wixappsClassics.min.js
342 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
124 ms
zepto.min.js
123 ms
color.min.js
123 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
89 ms
bt
77 ms
dc.js
42 ms
bt
361 ms
latin.css
352 ms
63bc8b_57c0ca4d75074d3ba25d080855cbf41f.jpg
229 ms
css
138 ms
StripShowcase.html
136 ms
Widget
504 ms
sdk.js
114 ms
d3470ec8ca26475da4b228f0199b5d3d.png
89 ms
7177d158c36d432b93f51e54f80e2f3c.png
88 ms
926de6fb9c0f4885ada77bb75be0ac96.png
376 ms
af037f3cc11741d1ada5c7f70d1074bf.png
376 ms
e2cfdb3b26514f2e9e4518f37213b99c.png
376 ms
530d907aaf7648c89c79be7eea724d9c.png
376 ms
d75821b3625d16f95dfd8ebff761922d.png
335 ms
1668fefe9eca1566d239f5101c2af490.png
374 ms
f81288cef4de8223015ce3dabe23a0c4.png
375 ms
11aefc291afd86827bd954967b185edc.png
388 ms
09b721261e9fba8dd8a96ee539a0743f.png
391 ms
e83942d98df1989e10269ad67034ea34.png
389 ms
058dcec0ee7cae49a2f9cbbc64848d0f.png
386 ms
63bc8b_588d75d30574450cac07ae56814c9400.jpg
607 ms
bt
85 ms
bt
371 ms
bt
372 ms
jquery.min.js
317 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.min.js
330 ms
lodash.min.js
329 ms
Wix.js
472 ms
style.min.css
370 ms
app.min.js
327 ms
__utm.gif
300 ms
389 ms
bc176270-17fa-4c78-a343-9fe52824e501.woff
296 ms
03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff
267 ms
53f05821-c783-4593-bf20-c3d770f32863.woff
267 ms
o6rNQ4O3mMTvz3bHPzdNOw.ttf
255 ms
5t8vP9Hx2udzw372glmOxA.ttf
267 ms
b059d02a-a222-4c63-9fd3-705eaeea1c16.woff
268 ms
xd_arbiter.php
263 ms
xd_arbiter.php
298 ms
ejLRhBEorqjLDaF8s-xuTQ.ttf
293 ms
7M5kxD4eGxuhgFaIk95pBS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
291 ms
ugc-viewer
60 ms
wix.min.js
55 ms
json2.min.js
285 ms
modernizr.custom.32317.js
283 ms
jquery.min.js
35 ms
sphereup.widget.wix.min.js
307 ms
su-wix-widget.min.js
96 ms
ga.js
28 ms
su_w_s_widget_initial.css
39 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
Settings
46 ms
artpeople.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
artpeople.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
artpeople.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Artpeople.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Artpeople.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
artpeople.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Art People. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: