3.7 sec in total
298 ms
3.1 sec
334 ms
Visit ateneorome.com now to see the best up-to-date Ateneo Rome content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ateneorome.com
Lovely, centric hotel in Rome, Ateneo Garden Palace, Termini Station area, San Lorenzo district of rome. Ideal hotel for holidays or work stopovers
Visit ateneorome.comWe analyzed Ateneorome.com page load time and found that the first response time was 298 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
ateneorome.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value19.6 s
0/100
25%
Value9.7 s
11/100
10%
Value380 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.436
21/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
298 ms
683 ms
43 ms
107 ms
214 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Ateneorome.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Ateneorome.com.
Page size can be reduced by 45.7 kB (13%)
341.3 kB
295.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Ateneorome.com main page is 341.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 282.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.8 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ateneo Rome images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 719 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ateneorome.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (59%)
71
29
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ateneo Rome. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ateneorome.com
298 ms
www.ateneorome.com
683 ms
css
43 ms
reset.css
107 ms
foundation.css
214 ms
font-awesome.min.css
305 ms
isotope.css
304 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
302 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
308 ms
archtek-init.css
308 ms
jquery-ui.css
37 ms
custom.modernizr.js
318 ms
jquery-1.10.2.js
42 ms
jquery-ui.js
46 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
43 ms
api.js
52 ms
foundation.min.js
413 ms
js
63 ms
jquery.backstretch.min.js
424 ms
superfish.js
426 ms
supersubs.js
423 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
425 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js
430 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
521 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
532 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.1.0-packed.js
631 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
547 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
546 ms
jquery.hoverdir.js
543 ms
jquery.validationEngine-en.js
627 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
637 ms
jquery.scrollUp.min.js
653 ms
archtek.js
653 ms
foundation.dropdown.js
663 ms
archtek.css
436 ms
analytics.js
76 ms
logo_210_4.png
163 ms
en.gif
148 ms
de.gif
148 ms
es.gif
148 ms
fr.gif
149 ms
it.gif
148 ms
jp.gif
219 ms
ru.gif
219 ms
se.gif
219 ms
loading-black.gif
233 ms
640_entrata_a_2000.jpg
1203 ms
640_colazione_a_2000.jpg
1290 ms
640_giardino_a_2000.jpg
1091 ms
slider-shadow.png
319 ms
cam_308_b_255.jpg
510 ms
bar_b_255.jpg
436 ms
cam_110_c_255.jpg
618 ms
colazione_a_255.jpg
639 ms
cam_210_a_255.jpg
712 ms
cam_222_a_255.jpg
722 ms
cam_212_a_255.jpg
745 ms
entrata_a_255.jpg
917 ms
quote-bg.png
830 ms
rew_Venere.jpg
861 ms
recaptcha__en.js
140 ms
foot_eventi.jpg
910 ms
foot_offerte.jpg
942 ms
foot_gallery.jpg
997 ms
facebook-bw.png
1013 ms
facebook.png
1045 ms
googleplus-bw.png
1100 ms
googleplus.png
1116 ms
twitter-bw.png
1150 ms
twitter.png
1168 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
54 ms
NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMPmCA.ttf
68 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffBzCGItzZg.ttf
68 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1081 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
80 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
88 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
89 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
88 ms
collect
73 ms
dark-bottom.css
12 ms
ateneorome.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ateneorome.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ateneorome.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ateneorome.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ateneorome.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ateneorome.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ateneo Rome. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: