4 sec in total
40 ms
3.5 sec
457 ms
Click here to check amazing Atmail content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about atmail.com
Want us to host your email platform in our atmail cloud? Save on infrastructure and maintenance costs. Choose your data centre (US, EU). Cloud email hosting. Hosted email.
Visit atmail.comWe analyzed Atmail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
atmail.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value13.6 s
0/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value930 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value13.3 s
11/100
10%
40 ms
53 ms
107 ms
192 ms
300 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Atmail.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Atmail.com.
Page size can be reduced by 99.6 kB (14%)
729.7 kB
630.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Atmail.com main page is 729.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 352.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Atmail images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 40.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.5 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Atmail.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (60%)
63
25
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Atmail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
atmail.com
40 ms
atmail.com
53 ms
www.atmail.com
107 ms
046ee4ee-bd0a-4d70-8c0e-7fe3a86a276c
192 ms
style.min.css
300 ms
style-index.css
304 ms
plugins.css
338 ms
custom.css
313 ms
fonts.css
317 ms
style.css
288 ms
responsive.css
578 ms
default.css
580 ms
sassy-social-share-public.css
583 ms
jquery.min.js
592 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
573 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
38 ms
js
82 ms
email-decode.min.js
341 ms
owl.carousel.css
746 ms
widgets.css
847 ms
site_tracking.js
870 ms
lsow-frontend.min.js
900 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
844 ms
animonscroll.js
894 ms
plugin.js
992 ms
main.js
1131 ms
sassy-social-share-public.js
1117 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1144 ms
gtm.js
140 ms
gtm.js
141 ms
logoalt_1.svg
528 ms
help-center.png
568 ms
faqs.png
639 ms
video.png
754 ms
profesional-services2.png
810 ms
training-service2-1.png
797 ms
profesional-services.png
795 ms
contact-support.png
872 ms
bg-prog.jpg
943 ms
Cloud_with_yellow_plane-2.svg
1026 ms
Singtel_logo.png
1076 ms
arvig2.png
1079 ms
nex-tech.png
1070 ms
legal-shield2.png
1167 ms
Compass-ISO-27001-Stacked-Icon-V2-3.png
1208 ms
wcag21_a_aa_transp.png
1293 ms
stopwatch2.svg
1321 ms
rocket-2.svg
1338 ms
profit2.svg
1344 ms
tag-2.svg
1419 ms
trust-3.svg
1471 ms
padlock3.svg
1573 ms
shield-2.svg
1606 ms
king2-2.svg
1610 ms
star2.svg
1615 ms
ux-300x249_2.jpg
1629 ms
OpenSauceSans-Regular.woff
1648 ms
insight.min.js
117 ms
analytics.js
51 ms
fbevents.js
67 ms
capterra_tracker.js
153 ms
tag.aspx
101 ms
OpenSauceSans-Medium.woff
1660 ms
OpenSauceSans-Light.woff
1671 ms
collect
58 ms
collect
42 ms
OpenSauceSans-Bold.woff
1654 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
153 ms
OpenSauceSans-ExtraBold.woff
1653 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1711 ms
collect
11 ms
ga-audiences
82 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1642 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1703 ms
OpenSauceSans-Medium.ttf
314 ms
OpenSauceSans-Light.ttf
270 ms
OpenSauceSans-Bold.ttf
287 ms
OpenSauceSans-ExtraBold.ttf
339 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
340 ms
OpenSauceSans-Medium.svg
259 ms
OpenSauceSans-Light.svg
275 ms
OpenSauceSans-Bold.svg
285 ms
OpenSauceSans-ExtraBold.svg
306 ms
fa-solid-900.svg
263 ms
atmail.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
atmail.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
atmail.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Atmail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Atmail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
atmail.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Atmail. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: