992 ms in total
78 ms
636 ms
278 ms
Welcome to attacker.net homepage info - get ready to check Attacker best content right away, or after learning these important things about attacker.net
Provider of Server Management, Website Security, Website Malware Removal, Website Firewall, Server Security, Consulting and Outsourced Hosting Support solutions.
Visit attacker.netWe analyzed Attacker.net page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 914 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
attacker.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value180 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.521
15/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
78 ms
106 ms
37 ms
53 ms
58 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Attacker.net, 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (150 ms) belongs to the original domain Attacker.net.
Page size can be reduced by 453.9 kB (42%)
1.1 MB
624.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Attacker.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 684.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 155.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Attacker needs image optimization as it can save up to 155.4 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 147.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 147.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 136.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Attacker.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 136.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (53%)
45
21
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Attacker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
attacker.net
78 ms
attacker.net
106 ms
bootstrap.css
37 ms
responsive.css
53 ms
style.css
58 ms
camera.css
55 ms
jquery.js
80 ms
jquery-migrate-1.1.1.js
79 ms
superfish.js
80 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.js
77 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
77 ms
jquery.ui.totop.js
77 ms
jquery.equalheights.js
96 ms
camera.js
95 ms
jquery.mobile.customized.min.js
102 ms
bootstrap.js
95 ms
css
60 ms
css
71 ms
css
82 ms
glow.png
150 ms
logo.png
24 ms
search_bg.png
26 ms
magnify.png
26 ms
menu_border.png
23 ms
menu-marker.png
23 ms
shadow.png
38 ms
linux.png
39 ms
windows.png
37 ms
Icon07-02.png
53 ms
outsource.png
54 ms
high.png
74 ms
backup.png
77 ms
management-down.jpg
85 ms
list_arrow.png
85 ms
security-down.jpg
122 ms
out-down.jpg
83 ms
emergency-down.jpg
101 ms
list_arrow1.png
102 ms
follow_icon1.png
101 ms
follow_icon2.png
115 ms
follow_icon3.png
101 ms
prev.png
115 ms
next.png
115 ms
camera-loader.gif
115 ms
security-top.jpg
137 ms
PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ14nF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
44 ms
LeFlHvsZjXu2c3ZRgBq9nKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
67 ms
HQXBIwLHsOJCNEQeX9kNz4nF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
76 ms
eCpfeMZI7q4jLksXVRWPQy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
76 ms
lJAvZoKA5NttpPc9yc6lPfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
91 ms
management-top.jpg
34 ms
top.png
19 ms
attacker.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
attacker.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
attacker.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Attacker.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Attacker.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
attacker.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Attacker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: