Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

audioscope.net

audioScope

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

976 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

121 ms

audioscope.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing AudioScope content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about audioscope.net

Sales of Vintage Stereo Equipment. Find the finest classic Audio Gear at audioScope.net

Visit audioscope.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Audioscope.net page load time and found that the first response time was 976 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

audioscope.net performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

46/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

59/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,140 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.7 s

56/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

audioscope.net

976 ms

www.audioscope.net

438 ms

stylesheet.css

97 ms

element.js

48 ms

logo.gif

188 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Audioscope.net, 14% (5 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Translate.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (976 ms) belongs to the original domain Audioscope.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 106.5 kB (27%)

Content Size

399.1 kB

After Optimization

292.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Audioscope.net main page is 399.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 273.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 27.3 kB

  • Original 33.4 kB
  • After minification 31.2 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 73.3 kB

  • Original 273.1 kB
  • After minification 199.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, AudioScope needs image optimization as it can save up to 73.3 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 770 B

  • Original 82.7 kB
  • After minification 82.7 kB
  • After compression 81.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 10.0 kB
  • After minification 8.7 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Audioscope.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.1 kB or 51% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (39%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of AudioScope. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

audioscope.net accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

audioscope.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

audioscope.net SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Audioscope.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Audioscope.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of AudioScope. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: