6.8 sec in total
1.3 sec
2.8 sec
2.7 sec
Welcome to baby-carriers-reviews.com homepage info - get ready to check Baby Carriers Reviews best content right away, or after learning these important things about baby-carriers-reviews.com
Find out how to choose the best baby carrier for you and your baby with our comprehensive baby carriers buying guide and top ten best baby carrier reviews!
Visit baby-carriers-reviews.comWe analyzed Baby-carriers-reviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
baby-carriers-reviews.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value7.5 s
27/100
10%
Value1,900 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.451
20/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
1253 ms
46 ms
87 ms
101 ms
107 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Baby-carriers-reviews.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Babyadvisor.org.
Page size can be reduced by 180.7 kB (19%)
976.6 kB
795.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Baby-carriers-reviews.com main page is 976.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 325.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 135.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 135.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 559 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Baby Carriers Reviews images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 39.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Baby-carriers-reviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.5 kB or 19% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (59%)
59
24
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Baby Carriers Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
1253 ms
style.min.css
46 ms
aalb_basics.css
87 ms
essb-subscribe.min.css
101 ms
easy-social-share-buttons.min.css
107 ms
default.min.css
105 ms
style.css
60 ms
responsive.css
113 ms
iconstyle.css
79 ms
font-awesome.min.css
93 ms
jetpack.css
166 ms
jquery.js
50 ms
postviews.js
110 ms
wp-table-builder-frontend.js
111 ms
js
86 ms
adsbygoogle.js
84 ms
onejs
9 ms
js_composer.min.css
124 ms
numbox.css
381 ms
prettylist.css
87 ms
promobox.css
377 ms
dividers.css
253 ms
shortcodes.css
101 ms
shortcodes.css
112 ms
essb-core.min.js
251 ms
inview.js
375 ms
pgwmodal.js
510 ms
unveil.js
368 ms
hoverintent.js
374 ms
niceselect.js
369 ms
countdown.js
369 ms
custom.js
369 ms
ajaxsearch.js
508 ms
comment-reply.min.js
5 ms
wp-embed.min.js
5 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
369 ms
custom_scroll.js
371 ms
e-202404.js
31 ms
d3c46173834d300373224933abe5a52b
340 ms
The-Baby-Advisor-Logo.png
330 ms
Best-Baby-Carrier.jpg
275 ms
Baby-Carrier-300x242.png
331 ms
Ergobaby-360-Ergonomic-Baby-Carrier-Editor%E2%80%99s-Choice-e1524912299617.jpg
330 ms
Boba-Wrap-Soft-Baby-Wrap-e1524912279206.jpg
329 ms
Beco-Gemini-Organic-Baby-Carrier-e1524912263624.jpg
330 ms
Baby-K%E2%80%99tan-ORIGINAL-Baby-Carrier-e1524912247204.jpg
330 ms
Tula-Ergonomic-Toddler-Carrier-Editor%E2%80%99s-Choice-e1524912394379.jpg
542 ms
Hip-Baby-Woven-Baby-Wrap-e1524912328433.jpg
542 ms
LILLEbaby-Complete-All-Seasons-Baby-Carrier-e1524912355342.jpg
541 ms
Hip-Baby-Wrap-Ring-Sling-e1524912342122.jpg
542 ms
Luvdbaby-Premium-Baby-Backpack-Carrier-e1524912371694.jpg
541 ms
Ergobaby-360-Ergonomic-Baby-Carrier-e1524912315536.jpg
542 ms
TaSha-Franklin-150x150.jpg
544 ms
noimage_70_70.png
546 ms
blank.gif
543 ms
baby-registry.jpg
544 ms
noimage_123_90.png
546 ms
show_ads_impl.js
234 ms
zrt_lookup.html
210 ms
rhicons.ttf
348 ms
essb.woff
212 ms
ads
361 ms
best-toddlers-sliders-ojhjcuopu5zbfs0sv3532kvxl3hmqbfnz8d7ayrlmk.jpg
71 ms
baby-carriers-reviews.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
baby-carriers-reviews.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
baby-carriers-reviews.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Baby-carriers-reviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Baby-carriers-reviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
baby-carriers-reviews.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Baby Carriers Reviews. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: