4.7 sec in total
340 ms
3.8 sec
586 ms
Click here to check amazing Banning content for Netherlands. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about banning.nl
Ga voor professioneel en deskundig juridisch advies naar een van onze advocatenkantoren te 's-Hertogenbosch of Amsterdam. Daag ons uit.
Visit banning.nlWe analyzed Banning.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 340 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
banning.nl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value9.5 s
0/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value940 ms
29/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
340 ms
2267 ms
16 ms
706 ms
208 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Banning.nl, 21% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Banning.nl.
Page size can be reduced by 624.4 kB (45%)
1.4 MB
752.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Banning.nl main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 549.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Banning images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 277.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 277.2 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 320.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Banning.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 320.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (21%)
19
15
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Banning. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
banning.nl
340 ms
www.banning.nl
2267 ms
analytics.js
16 ms
connect.onlinesucces.nl
706 ms
main.css
208 ms
css
54 ms
css
67 ms
global.min.js
250 ms
js
87 ms
banning.js
510 ms
collect
14 ms
collect
50 ms
ga-audiences
33 ms
jquery.js
87 ms
banning-logo.png
84 ms
vlag__nl.png
83 ms
us_flag.jpg
280 ms
A8ABECDB-492E-488C-9903FB547B0F18D7_medium.jpg
319 ms
still-bg.jpg
397 ms
amsterdam.jpg
542 ms
about-us-bg.jpg
767 ms
unchecked.png
392 ms
checked.png
398 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
18 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
30 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNNE-IuDiR70wI4zXaKqWCM.ttf
210 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
210 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
210 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
210 ms
banning.nl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
banning.nl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
banning.nl SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
NL
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Banning.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Banning.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
banning.nl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Banning. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: