5.5 sec in total
847 ms
4.3 sec
323 ms
Visit beauty-plus.info now to see the best up-to-date Beauty Plus content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about beauty-plus.info
ネットやブログで話題のダイエット・コスメアイテムをいち早くご紹介!商品は毎日更新中!
Visit beauty-plus.infoWe analyzed Beauty-plus.info page load time and found that the first response time was 847 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
beauty-plus.info performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.8 s
0/100
10%
Value14.7 s
0/100
25%
Value15.4 s
1/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.059
98/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
847 ms
149 ms
295 ms
298 ms
296 ms
Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Beauty-plus.info, 7% (7 requests) were made to Bypass.ad-stir.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Tg.socdm.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Beauty-plus.info.
Page size can be reduced by 372.7 kB (67%)
558.4 kB
185.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Beauty-plus.info main page is 558.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 367.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.8 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Beauty Plus needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 252.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 252.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 85.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beauty-plus.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (63%)
83
31
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beauty Plus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
beauty-plus.info
847 ms
common.css
149 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.css
295 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.22.custom.css
298 ms
main.js
296 ms
pk.css
326 ms
clone.js
332 ms
css.js
440 ms
navi.js
441 ms
win_op.js
443 ms
site.js
487 ms
jquery.js
663 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.min.js
493 ms
jquery.mouse.wheel.min.js
587 ms
tilescroller.js
588 ms
bestproducts.js.php
592 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.22.custom.min.js
995 ms
so_sg.js
756 ms
mk
301 ms
import.css
511 ms
block.css
153 ms
btn.css
166 ms
footer.css
150 ms
frame.css
151 ms
guide.css
168 ms
header.css
297 ms
index.css
295 ms
main.css
297 ms
mypage.css
327 ms
news.css
329 ms
products.css
442 ms
shopping.css
449 ms
sub_function.css
442 ms
recommend.css
487 ms
ranking.css
491 ms
window.css
497 ms
media-queries.css
601 ms
design_controller.js.php
160 ms
bg_common.png
177 ms
pcn_pv.jpg
176 ms
164 ms
icon_cart.png
148 ms
icon_mini_kotira.png
160 ms
icon_login.png
231 ms
icon_id.png
309 ms
icon_pass.png
295 ms
icon_search.png
308 ms
original_pc_logo.png
325 ms
icon_category.png
316 ms
icon_arrow_b.png
363 ms
qr_img.png
420 ms
icon_guide.png
448 ms
bnrsmp_diet.gif
433 ms
original_pc_flasharea_image.gif
1799 ms
icon_recomend.png
447 ms
resize_image.php
478 ms
resize_image.php
541 ms
resize_image.php
555 ms
resize_image.php
586 ms
resize_image.php
618 ms
resize_image.php
631 ms
resize_image.php
696 ms
resize_image.php
722 ms
icon_news.png
748 ms
icon_news_s.png
778 ms
title_oshiharai.gif
776 ms
title_aboutcontact.gif
841 ms
title_henpin.gif
868 ms
title_hikiwatashi.gif
908 ms
title_souryou.gif
922 ms
img_haisoujikan.gif
942 ms
title_aboutprivacy.gif
986 ms
pagetop.gif
1016 ms
segmentation.js
4 ms
js
529 ms
push_sync
150 ms
mk
303 ms
cnt
341 ms
ga.js
12 ms
beacon.html
28 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
receive_sync
152 ms
sosync
191 ms
pixel
16 ms
pixel
14 ms
receive_sync
151 ms
15 ms
sync
599 ms
sync_before
190 ms
sync_before
339 ms
sync_before
341 ms
idsync
347 ms
sync
366 ms
22 ms
sync
578 ms
sync
499 ms
pixel
12 ms
sync
598 ms
cs
298 ms
is
752 ms
Pug
17 ms
sd
72 ms
tap.php
5 ms
receive_sync
152 ms
receive_sync
151 ms
beauty-plus.info accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
beauty-plus.info best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
beauty-plus.info SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beauty-plus.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beauty-plus.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
beauty-plus.info
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beauty Plus. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: