4.6 sec in total
1.4 sec
2.6 sec
666 ms
Visit behindtheracks.com now to see the best up-to-date Behind The Racks content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about behindtheracks.com
Visit behindtheracks.comWe analyzed Behindtheracks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
behindtheracks.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
75/100
10%
Value2.4 s
91/100
25%
Value2.3 s
99/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.2 s
85/100
10%
1401 ms
65 ms
130 ms
106 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Behindtheracks.com, 9% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Behindtheracks.com.
Page size can be reduced by 520.2 kB (45%)
1.1 MB
626.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Behindtheracks.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 528.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Behind The Racks needs image optimization as it can save up to 69.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 151.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 151.4 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 242.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Behindtheracks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 242.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (57%)
82
35
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Behind The Racks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
behindtheracks.com
1401 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
65 ms
ts-fab.min.css
130 ms
tab.css
106 ms
bootstrap.min.css
160 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
113 ms
cyberchimps-responsive.min.css
107 ms
core.css
115 ms
style.css
172 ms
elements.css
178 ms
legacy.css
173 ms
jetpack.css
178 ms
jquery.js
263 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
208 ms
ts-fab.min.js
212 ms
tab.js
221 ms
gallery-lightbox.min.js
215 ms
jquery.slimbox.min.js
228 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
253 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
283 ms
swipe-call.min.js
296 ms
core.min.js
284 ms
elements.min.js
285 ms
in.js
6 ms
widgets.js
137 ms
show_ads.js
7 ms
507 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
gprofiles.js
60 ms
wpgroho.js
329 ms
bootstrap.min.js
332 ms
retina-1.1.0.min.js
332 ms
wp-embed.min.js
355 ms
e-201611.js
6 ms
kj122bosgmk5DBC97F8577CDEFAC57A7EEBF66C666
28 ms
eo101fz2rxvGOMNKIQJGIILPJNOJGILJLJNQMIMHHH
27 ms
blue.jpg
264 ms
topbarbg.jpg
716 ms
behindtheracks3.png
69 ms
home.png
75 ms
loadBalancers-640-240-150x150.png
85 ms
mysql-cluster-640x240-150x150.png
142 ms
openstack-ha-controller-640x240-150x150.png
189 ms
ceph-150x150.png
163 ms
keystone-150x150.png
188 ms
glance-and-swift-640-240-150x150.png
188 ms
neutron-slider-150x150.png
197 ms
binary-star-150x150.png
494 ms
openstack-ad-slider-150x150.png
220 ms
actifio-LARGE-150x150.jpg
493 ms
juno-slider-150x150.png
519 ms
dedup-150x150.png
612 ms
lightning-150x150.png
520 ms
heat-150x150.png
518 ms
myTestLab-640-240-150x150.png
517 ms
wpspin-2x.gif
627 ms
rss.png
626 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
76 ms
11482672-1454342512331
500 ms
11678946-1456850179175
72 ms
plusone.js
133 ms
ca-pub-5703538533812817.js
104 ms
zrt_lookup.html
95 ms
show_ads_impl.js
476 ms
share
366 ms
sprite_connect_v14.png
114 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
42 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
65 ms
fastbutton
319 ms
w_lenb10c2.gif
62 ms
w_ct191c2.gif
61 ms
308 ms
counter.js
37 ms
t.php
268 ms
postmessageRelay
333 ms
hovercard.css
129 ms
services.css
131 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
190 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
24 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
22 ms
g.gif
18 ms
ads
246 ms
osd.js
47 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
83 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
87 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
8 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
48 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
87 ms
behindtheracks.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
behindtheracks.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
behindtheracks.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Behindtheracks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Behindtheracks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
behindtheracks.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Behind The Racks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: