8.2 sec in total
2.9 sec
5 sec
278 ms
Click here to check amazing Bioscreening content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bioscreening.com
Bioscreening Company Directory. BioScreening
Visit bioscreening.comWe analyzed Bioscreening.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
bioscreening.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value5.8 s
50/100
10%
Value240 ms
85/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
2904 ms
134 ms
130 ms
134 ms
136 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Bioscreening.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Bioscreening.com.
Page size can be reduced by 297.5 kB (59%)
505.5 kB
208.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Bioscreening.com main page is 505.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 172.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bioscreening images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 89.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.6 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 143.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bioscreening.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 143.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (64%)
80
29
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bioscreening. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.bioscreening.com
2904 ms
gantry.css
134 ms
grid-16.css
130 ms
joomla.css
134 ms
joomla.css
136 ms
extended.css
163 ms
demo-styles.css
169 ms
splitmenu.css
259 ms
template.css
289 ms
overlay.css
291 ms
typography.css
295 ms
nsb.css
297 ms
rokajaxsearch.css
321 ms
rokajaxsearch-theme.css
382 ms
rokstock.css
419 ms
mootools.js
534 ms
gantry-totop.js
448 ms
gantry-buildspans.js
449 ms
gantry-inputs.js
485 ms
rokajaxsearch.js
521 ms
shajax.js
548 ms
template.js
578 ms
rokstock.js
610 ms
standard_advanced.css
663 ms
com_sobi2.css
664 ms
style.css
677 ms
plusone.js
102 ms
ga.js
11 ms
chart
41 ms
addsign.gif
91 ms
addsign_a.gif
128 ms
ActiComNew.gif
135 ms
myriascreenanim468-60.gif
189 ms
feed.gif
202 ms
time_axis_labels.gif
229 ms
SMI-2016-0613-ADMET.jpg
345 ms
SELECT-BIO-2016-0510-HC&PS.jpg
264 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
logo3.png
252 ms
overlay9.png
353 ms
white-25.png
313 ms
submenu-overlay.png
345 ms
article-icons.png
392 ms
arrows.png
413 ms
circles.png
438 ms
delete.png
472 ms
reload.png
488 ms
search-icon.png
506 ms
black-5.png
528 ms
mini_arrowleft.gif
538 ms
mini_arrowright.gif
564 ms
facebook_aqu_24.png
598 ms
myspace_aqu_24.png
648 ms
twitter_aqu_24.png
632 ms
digg_aqu_24.png
687 ms
delicious_aqu_24.png
704 ms
stumbleupon_aqu_24.png
726 ms
google_aqu_24.png
724 ms
reddit_aqu_24.png
792 ms
newsvine_aqu_24.png
814 ms
technorati_aqu_24.png
853 ms
linkedin_aqu_24.png
864 ms
mixx_aqu_24.png
885 ms
rss_aqu_24.png
884 ms
bg1.gif
937 ms
arrows.png
372 ms
rect.gif
909 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
16 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
30 ms
fastbutton
102 ms
button-overlay.png
966 ms
postmessageRelay
35 ms
divider.png
938 ms
white-45.png
917 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
39 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
49 ms
rs=AGLTcCMZQMkD3nQb9neyXrDGlfp1IpCqrw
28 ms
footer-overlay1.png
863 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
16 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
25 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
15 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
39 ms
arrows.png
712 ms
bioscreening.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
bioscreening.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
bioscreening.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bioscreening.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bioscreening.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bioscreening.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bioscreening. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: