1.8 sec in total
99 ms
1 sec
684 ms
Welcome to birft.com homepage info - get ready to check BiRFT best content right away, or after learning these important things about birft.com
Wondering what business applications you need to start your business? Our business systems consulting services can help save you time.
Visit birft.comWe analyzed Birft.com page load time and found that the first response time was 99 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
birft.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value11.9 s
0/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value2,010 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.067
97/100
15%
Value13.2 s
12/100
10%
99 ms
62 ms
49 ms
32 ms
64 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Birft.com, 21% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (509 ms) relates to the external source Salesiq.zoho.com.
Page size can be reduced by 87.7 kB (3%)
3.4 MB
3.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Birft.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 86.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. BiRFT images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 115 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 43 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Birft.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (62%)
66
25
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of BiRFT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
birft.com
99 ms
birft.com
62 ms
css
49 ms
style.min.css
32 ms
extendify-utilities.css
64 ms
styles.css
59 ms
settings.css
60 ms
bootstrap.min.css
49 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
67 ms
font-awesome.min.css
61 ms
style.css
71 ms
flaticon.css
69 ms
animate.css
91 ms
magnific-popup.css
93 ms
style.css
83 ms
responsive.css
120 ms
gutenberg.css
93 ms
js_composer.min.css
98 ms
jquery.min.js
131 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
118 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
144 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
144 ms
js
118 ms
email-decode.min.js
116 ms
index.js
247 ms
index.js
250 ms
bootstrap.min.js
248 ms
jquery.form.js
249 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
250 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
248 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
250 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
254 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
252 ms
theme.js
250 ms
api.js
59 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
251 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
250 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
251 ms
index.js
252 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
253 ms
insight.min.js
154 ms
widget
509 ms
BRIFT-Logo-8a-e1511730311723.png
152 ms
BRIFT-Logo-8a-xsmall-1.png
152 ms
qtq80-vaanu3.jpeg
155 ms
qtq80-5f552W.jpeg
154 ms
qtq80-rQZqIU.jpeg
152 ms
qtq80-3bkM17.jpeg
154 ms
qtq80-Jwb6Ky.jpeg
156 ms
qtq80-HcSPiv.jpeg
158 ms
qtq80-mzOWwo.jpeg
159 ms
qtq80-YzhI0c.jpeg
161 ms
qtq80-lxOr2W-e1512362173275.jpeg
158 ms
qtq80-uzbk3p.jpeg
155 ms
qtq80-IZOnxT.jpeg
219 ms
qtq80-be9qWe.jpeg
220 ms
bookkeeping-370x218.jpg
217 ms
ask-2341784_640-370x218.jpg
218 ms
womein-in-it-370x218.jpg
217 ms
js
146 ms
analytics.js
142 ms
font
116 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
126 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
128 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
129 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
129 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
128 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
127 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
131 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff
131 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexg.woff
132 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
124 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff
132 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
133 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff
179 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff
179 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff
182 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
181 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff
182 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff
182 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
172 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
168 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
173 ms
insight.old.min.js
135 ms
collect
79 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
89 ms
revicons.woff
27 ms
birft.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
birft.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
birft.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Birft.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Birft.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
birft.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of BiRFT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: