Report Summary

  • 4

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    18% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

Page Load Speed

10.5 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

8.5 sec

Page Rendered

762 ms

bomba32.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bomba 32 content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bomba32.com

Visit bomba32.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bomba32.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 9.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bomba32.com performance score

4

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,230 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.947

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.6 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bomba32.com

1204 ms

default.css

880 ms

global.css

434 ms

css3-pack.css

435 ms

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

1150 ms

Our browser made a total of 197 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (186 requests) were addressed to the original Bomba32.com, 2% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Mapmyuser.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Bomba32.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (12%)

Content Size

9.5 MB

After Optimization

8.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Bomba32.com main page is 9.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 8.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 96.6 kB

  • Original 114.0 kB
  • After minification 84.2 kB
  • After compression 17.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.8 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 655.8 kB

  • Original 8.9 MB
  • After minification 8.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bomba 32 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 306.5 kB

  • Original 434.2 kB
  • After minification 413.8 kB
  • After compression 127.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 306.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 69.7 kB

  • Original 84.7 kB
  • After minification 78.4 kB
  • After compression 15.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bomba32.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (20%)

Requests Now

192

After Optimization

154

The browser has sent 192 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bomba 32. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bomba32.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

The document uses <meta http-equiv="refresh">

Best Practices

bomba32.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

bomba32.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    TR

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bomba32.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bomba32.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bomba 32. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: