Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

boundaryfence.com

Residential & Industrial Fencing Company in Denver, CO

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

86 ms

Resources Loaded

681 ms

Page Rendered

359 ms

boundaryfence.com screenshot

About Website

Visit boundaryfence.com now to see the best up-to-date Boundaryfence content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about boundaryfence.com

We are a Fencing company that offers Commercial fencing products, Custom Gates, Pet Kennels, Fence Installation, Fence Material Supplier, Iron Fences, & More!

Visit boundaryfence.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Boundaryfence.com page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

boundaryfence.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

64/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.381

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

boundaryfence.com

86 ms

boundaryfence.com

98 ms

style.min.css

18 ms

css.css

81 ms

full-styles.6.10.6.css

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Boundaryfence.com, 36% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (276 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 228.1 kB (8%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Boundaryfence.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 136.4 kB

  • Original 169.6 kB
  • After minification 163.6 kB
  • After compression 33.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 136.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 84.2 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Boundaryfence images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 67.5 kB
  • After minification 67.5 kB
  • After compression 67.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 192.7 kB
  • After minification 190.4 kB
  • After compression 185.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Boundaryfence.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (39%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Boundaryfence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

boundaryfence.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

boundaryfence.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

boundaryfence.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Boundaryfence.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Boundaryfence.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Boundaryfence. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: