9.1 sec in total
1.2 sec
7.7 sec
225 ms
Visit branditpack.com now to see the best up-to-date Branditpack content for Portugal and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about branditpack.com
A BoxMe, com mais de 40 anos de experiência, desenvolve soluções sustentáveis de embalagens de cartão, personalizados à imagem da sua empresa.
Visit branditpack.comWe analyzed Branditpack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
branditpack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
65/100
10%
Value3.0 s
78/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value3,530 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.445
21/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
1247 ms
80 ms
100 ms
569 ms
344 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Branditpack.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Branditpack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 436.6 kB (26%)
1.7 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Branditpack.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 134.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Branditpack needs image optimization as it can save up to 134.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 171.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 171.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 114.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Branditpack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 114.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (30%)
67
47
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Branditpack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
branditpack.com
1247 ms
jquery.min.js
80 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
100 ms
widgetkit-4d9165ba.css
569 ms
calendar.css
344 ms
front.css
458 ms
reset.css
365 ms
vmsite-ltr.css
484 ms
brandit-template.css
506 ms
menus.css
693 ms
loja.css
701 ms
tabs.css
803 ms
widgetkit-f1b1feae.js
948 ms
script.js
970 ms
slimScroll.js
922 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
1025 ms
script.js
1052 ms
jquery.tabs.js
1132 ms
project.css
1266 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.min.js
1307 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1436 ms
conversion.js
72 ms
lightbox.js
1190 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
1521 ms
spotlight.js
1185 ms
audi-experience.jpg
1436 ms
dest1.png
1225 ms
dest2.png
1338 ms
dest3.png
1350 ms
dest4.png
1351 ms
clarins.jpg
1825 ms
audi.jpg
1788 ms
gio.jpg
1904 ms
cdbayeragro.jpg
1826 ms
caixamartins.jpg
1826 ms
cdhertz.jpg
1916 ms
caixafarmacias.jpg
2243 ms
mangosteen.jpg
2383 ms
caixaefusive.jpg
2380 ms
kingsofhouse.jpg
2385 ms
cdjeronimos.jpg
2381 ms
ruadasaudade.jpg
2510 ms
caixaedicadata.jpg
2729 ms
cdstarwars.jpg
2828 ms
aguacastelo.jpg
2831 ms
cdprimavera.jpg
2980 ms
vulcano.jpg
2992 ms
sportzone.jpg
3067 ms
brandit-logo.png
3072 ms
next-logo.png
3163 ms
music-logo.png
3197 ms
copy-logo.png
3319 ms
ga.js
26 ms
topo.jpg
3327 ms
logo.png
3410 ms
separador.png
3422 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
gotham-bold-webfont.woff
3488 ms
menu-contactos.png
3388 ms
shadow-menu.png
3333 ms
772 ms
slideshow.js
2804 ms
social.png
2688 ms
49 ms
close.png
2550 ms
blank.gif
2596 ms
oxicocco.jpg
465 ms
clarins.jpg
784 ms
gio-rodrigues.jpg
718 ms
ruadasaudade.jpg
840 ms
branditpack.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
branditpack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
branditpack.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
PT
PT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Branditpack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Portuguese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Branditpack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
branditpack.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Branditpack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: