11.8 sec in total
4.8 sec
6.4 sec
561 ms
Click here to check amazing Brandprotect content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about brandprotect.com
PhishLabs provides Digital Risk Protection through curated threat intelligence and complete mitigation for web, social, and email threats.
Visit brandprotect.comWe analyzed Brandprotect.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.8 sec and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
brandprotect.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value1,570 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value15.0 s
8/100
10%
4812 ms
436 ms
64 ms
77 ms
44 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Brandprotect.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to 1.tl813.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Brandprotect.com.
Page size can be reduced by 302.4 kB (10%)
3.1 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Brandprotect.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Brandprotect images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 170.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 170.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 62.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Brandprotect.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 62.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (32%)
37
25
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Brandprotect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
brandprotect.com
4812 ms
M9B3KkrMSwkoyi9JTS7RT0_NSy3KTM7PK0Zi6higKiouqcxJRRdMLi7WL0otLgCqzyzDJaubW5qTWZKpm5uaV4pNCdC2ksTkkrT8olwA.css
436 ms
css
64 ms
css
77 ms
css
44 ms
M9bPKixNLarUMYYydHMz04sSS1L1cjPzAA.js
517 ms
jquery-1.10.2.js
9 ms
M9B3KkrMSwkoyi9JTS7RzyrWL0ot1s0tzcksydTNTc0r1THAUJFVWJpaVKlXkFiUmJOTWKFrqGeoZ4xFXXJpcUl-LgA.js
369 ms
M9B3KkrMSwkoyi9JTS7RzyrWL87OLNDNyczL1k3LTy4t1k3LrAAA.js
379 ms
M9B3KkrMSwkoyi9JTS7RzyrWTyvNSy7JzM8r1jHRLy_QTc1NSk3Ry83MAwA.js
390 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
155 ms
analytics.js
38 ms
logo.png
181 ms
slider.jpg
1060 ms
unmatrched_bg.png
1079 ms
topbg.png
174 ms
unmatrched_img1_rev2.png
406 ms
bottombg.png
173 ms
real_img1_rev2.jpg
252 ms
risk_img1_rev2.png
483 ms
team_img1_rev2.jpg
404 ms
book_bg.png
562 ms
down_icon1.png
481 ms
email_bg.png
788 ms
footer_logo.png
178 ms
facebook.png
177 ms
twiter.png
177 ms
in.png
177 ms
youtube.png
176 ms
googlelpus.png
250 ms
rss.png
257 ms
30658.js
163 ms
sf14g.js
231 ms
plus-icon.png
527 ms
collect
11 ms
collect
134 ms
ga-audiences
33 ms
tl813.js
229 ms
tl813.asp
77 ms
dot.gif
74 ms
__ptq.gif
6 ms
brandprotect.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
brandprotect.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
brandprotect.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Brandprotect.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Brandprotect.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
brandprotect.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Brandprotect. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: