2.3 sec in total
46 ms
1.8 sec
494 ms
Click here to check amazing Bridgemark Solutions content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bridgemarksolutions.com
Bridgemark Solutions offers proven sales support and market research services for thriving businesses nationwide, learn how we help you grow your revenues!
Visit bridgemarksolutions.comWe analyzed Bridgemarksolutions.com page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
bridgemarksolutions.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
69/100
10%
Value16.5 s
0/100
25%
Value15.0 s
1/100
10%
Value18,230 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.102
89/100
15%
Value27.4 s
0/100
10%
46 ms
140 ms
1127 ms
100 ms
143 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Bridgemarksolutions.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Grow.clearbitjs.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Bridgemarksolutions.com.
Page size can be reduced by 365.4 kB (45%)
813.3 kB
447.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Bridgemarksolutions.com main page is 813.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 396.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 330.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 330.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bridgemark Solutions images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 101 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (13%)
31
27
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bridgemark Solutions. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
bridgemarksolutions.com
46 ms
bridgemarksolutions.com
140 ms
www.bridgemarksolutions.com
1127 ms
pixel.js
100 ms
js
143 ms
all.js
245 ms
api.js
63 ms
logo.png
240 ms
splash-bg.jpg
312 ms
abercrombie-fitch.jpg
238 ms
boise.jpg
238 ms
cardinal-health.jpg
238 ms
expedia.jpg
243 ms
frito-lay.jpg
242 ms
google-icon.png
242 ms
honda.jpg
281 ms
ibm.jpg
281 ms
john-deere.jpg
279 ms
kelloggs.jpg
280 ms
lowes.jpg
279 ms
microsoft.jpg
309 ms
nascar.jpg
309 ms
officedepot.jpg
309 ms
pepsico.jpg
308 ms
quiznos.jpg
307 ms
revlon.jpg
314 ms
subway.jpg
311 ms
wal-mart.jpg
311 ms
walt-disney.jpg
314 ms
yum.jpg
314 ms
zimmer.jpg
313 ms
cta-bg.jpg
411 ms
OpenSans-Regular.woff
340 ms
OpenSans-SemiBold.woff
339 ms
OpenSans-Bold.woff
473 ms
analytics.js
189 ms
CrimsonText-Regular.woff
213 ms
CrimsonText-Bold.woff
71 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
211 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
212 ms
recaptcha__en.js
78 ms
widget.js
207 ms
collect
30 ms
bridgemarksolutions.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
bridgemarksolutions.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
bridgemarksolutions.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bridgemarksolutions.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bridgemarksolutions.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bridgemarksolutions.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bridgemark Solutions. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: