2.5 sec in total
184 ms
2.1 sec
176 ms
Welcome to c.tt homepage info - get ready to check C best content for China right away, or after learning these important things about c.tt
Find quality products at the most discounted price at China Discount Mall. The innovative multi-language international B2B and B2C trade platform. Import and export business at atupapa.com. Buy and se...
Visit c.ttWe analyzed C.tt page load time and found that the first response time was 184 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
c.tt performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value10.2 s
0/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value2,350 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value8.7 s
36/100
10%
184 ms
295 ms
176 ms
183 ms
179 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original C.tt, 92% (70 requests) were made to Atupapa.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Atupapa.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (42%)
2.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of C.tt main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 119.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. C images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 978.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 978.6 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. C.tt needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (24%)
74
56
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of C. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
c.tt
184 ms
www.atupapa.com
295 ms
ddsmoothmenu.css
176 ms
ddsmoothmenu-v.css
183 ms
top.css
179 ms
fw.js
182 ms
validate.js
180 ms
jquery.min.js
475 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
261 ms
adsbygoogle.js
8 ms
index_en.css
266 ms
mootools.js
627 ms
duotive-slider-gallery.js
272 ms
jquery.min.js
458 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
261 ms
jquery_nav.js
629 ms
index.js
280 ms
base.js
346 ms
scrolltopcontrol.js
372 ms
addthis_widget.js
10 ms
po.png
94 ms
cart.gif
97 ms
205688000301b.jpg
328 ms
35899000301s.jpg
219 ms
448861000301s.jpg
219 ms
473993000301s.jpg
220 ms
289457000301s.jpg
247 ms
452814000301b.jpg
330 ms
43433000301b.jpg
469 ms
112901000301b.jpg
379 ms
20720000301b.jpg
328 ms
451125000301b.jpg
329 ms
14370000301s.jpg
345 ms
325689000301s.jpg
457 ms
29152000301s.jpg
457 ms
255778000301s.jpg
458 ms
19150000301b.jpg
517 ms
200102000301b.jpg
473 ms
380817000301b.jpg
574 ms
486450000301b.jpg
488 ms
400415000301b.jpg
499 ms
442551000301s.jpg
555 ms
333435000301s.jpg
566 ms
163279000301s.jpg
576 ms
25738000301s.jpg
590 ms
392089000301b.jpg
690 ms
472567000301b.jpg
1017 ms
297434000301b.jpg
660 ms
123421000301b.jpg
749 ms
164005000011b.jpg
664 ms
215722000011s.jpg
677 ms
244246000011b.jpg
756 ms
252961000011s.jpg
723 ms
212471000011b.jpg
688 ms
206875000011s.jpg
749 ms
159821000011b.jpg
894 ms
193451000011s.jpg
636 ms
225449000011s.jpg
645 ms
239661000011s.jpg
648 ms
179926000011s.jpg
688 ms
300lo.json
55 ms
logo.gif
625 ms
top_line.gif
626 ms
m_top_bg_45.gif
626 ms
sch_btn_bg.gif
692 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
32 ms
top_line_2.gif
700 ms
maincn_1.gif
698 ms
maincn_2.gif
659 ms
layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js
8 ms
pullDownList-bg.jpg
748 ms
duotive-slideshow-preloader2.gif
651 ms
pic-pos.jpg
668 ms
gr_01.png
667 ms
gallery-slider-content-bg.png
665 ms
topback.jpg
708 ms
c.tt accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
The document uses <meta http-equiv="refresh">
c.tt best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
c.tt SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise C.tt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that C.tt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
c.tt
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of C. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: